Epizootic situation for brucellosis in the Russian Federation (review)
https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2023.24.1.20-29
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) considers brucellosis to be one of the most dangerous and spread zoonosis in the world. The aim of the review is to summarize the current scientific data on the brucellosis in animals, to analyze the epizootic situation in the Russian Federation, Arctic Zone included, and to define the key factors of animal protection against the infection. The epizootic situation for brucellosis in farm animals, which are carriers of the three main pathogens of brucellosis, is an urgent epidemiological problem. Their widespread occurrence is the factor determining the world-wide distribution of pathogens in most countries that indicates for the importance of control the brucellosis on an international scale. In Russia, a high epizootic risk of the spread of the disease is observed in the regions of the Volga, Southern and North Caucasian Federal Districts, in southern Siberia and Far East as well as in the Arctic. Brucellosis has the same epizootic and epidemiological significance in the Arctic regions considering the national food preferences of the peoples of the Far North. In the Russian Arctic, epizootic foci of brucellosis in cattle and reindeer have been identified and evidence of the epidemiological significance and ecological association of B. suis with the reindeer population has been presented. Specific prophylaxis of brucellosis is based on the use of vaccines. However, the problem of reindeer vaccination has not been finally resolved.
Supporting agencies: the research was carried out under the support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the state assignment of the Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (theme No. FGNM-0451-2021-0004).
About the Authors
O. I. Zakharova
Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Branch in Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga I. Zakharova, researcher, the Department of Epizootology and Risk Assessment Associated with Animal Health
Veterinarnaya st., 3, Nizhny Novgorod
O. A. Burova
Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Branch in Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga A. Burova, Deputy head of the group, the Department of Epizootology and Risk Assessment Associated with Animal Health
Veterinarnaya st., 3, Nizhny Novgorod
I. V. Iashin
Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Branch in Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan V. Iashin, PhD in Biological Science, Director of the Branch
Veterinarnaya st., 3, Nizhny Novgorod
A. A. Blokhin
Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Branch in Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Blokhin, PhD in Veterinary Science, leading researcher, the Department of Epizootology and Risk Assessment Associated with Animal Health
Veterinarnaya st., 3, Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Negrón M. E., Tille R., Kharod G. Brucellosis. In: CDC Yellow Book. 2019. pp. 114-118.
2. Craighead L., Chengat Prakashbabu B., Musallam I., Ndour A. P., Ayih-Akakpo A. A. P. S., Fotsac Dzousse M., Crystella Ngong C. A., Kameni Feussom J. M., Yempabou D., Mouiche-Mouliom M. M., Doumbia A., Fane A., Dembele E., Germaine L. M., Tapsoba A. S. R., Moussa S., Pato P., Pali M., Ba E. H., Alambédji R. B., Ayih-Akakpo J., Guitian J., Häsler B. Brucellosis in dairy herds: Farm characteristics and practices in relation to likely adoption of three potential private – public partnership (PPP) vaccination control strategies in West and Central Africa. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2022:69(3):1479-1505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14114
3. Głowacka P., Żakowska D., Naylor K., Niemcewicz M., Bielawska-Drózd A. Brucella – Virulence Factors, Pathogenesis and Treatment. Polish Journal Microbiology. 2018;67(2):151-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/pjm-2018-029
4. Khurana S. K., Sehrawat A., Tiwari R., Prasad M., Gulati B., Shabbir M. Z., Chhabra R., Karthik K., Patel Sh. K., Pathak M., Yatoo M. I., Gupta V. K., Dhama K., Sah R., Chaicumpa W. Bovine brucellosis – a comprehensive review. Veterinary Quarterly. 2021;41(1):61-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2020.1868616
5. Ran X., Cheng J., Wang M., Chen X., Wang H., Ge Y., Ni H., Zhang X.-X., Wen X. Brucellosis seroprevalence in dairy cattle in China during 2008-2018 : A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Tropica. 2019;189:117-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.10.002
6. Libera K., Konieczny K., Grabska J., Szopka W., Augustyniak A., Pomorska-Mól M. Selected LivestockAssociated Zoonoses as a Growing Challenge for Public Health. Infectious Disease Repopts. 2022;14(1):63-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/idr14010008
7. Darbandi A., Koupaei M., Navidifar T., Shahroodian S., Heidary M., Talebi M. Brucellosis control methods with an emphasis on vaccination: a systematic review. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2022;20(7):1025-1035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2022.2066521
8. Tulu D. Bovine Brucellosis: Epidemiology, Public Health Implications, and Status of Brucellosis in Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports. 2022;7(13):21-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S347337
9. Makita K., Fèvre E. M., Waiswa C., Eisler M. C., Thrusfield M., Welburn S. C. Herd prevalence of bovine brucellosis and analysis of risk factors in cattle in urban and peri-urban areas of the Kampala economic zone, Uganda. BMC Veterinary Research. 2011;7:60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-7-60
10. Moreno E. Genome evolution within the alpha Proteobacteria: why do some bacteria not possess plasmids and others exhibit more than one different chromosome? Microbiol Reviews. 1998;22(4):255-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1998.tb00370.x
11. Moreno E. Retrospective and prospective perspectives on zoonotic brucellosis. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5:213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00213
12. El-wahab E. W. A., Hegazy Y., El-tras W. F., Mikeal A., Kapaby A. F., Abdelfatah M., Bruce M., Eltholth M. M. Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAPs) and risk factors of brucellosis at the human-animal interface in the Nile Delta, Egypt. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2019;3:30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/607655
13. Middlebrook E. A., Romero A. T., Bett B., Nthiwa D., Oyola S. O., Fair J. M., Bartlow A.W. Identification and distribution of pathogens coinfecting with Brucella spp., Coxiella burnetii and Rift Valley fever virus in humans, livestock and wildlife. Zoonoses and Public Health. 2022;69(3):175-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12905
14. González-espinoza G., Arce-gorvel V., Mémet S., Gorvel J. Brucella: Reservoirs and Niches in Animals and Humans. Pathogens. 2021;10(2):186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020186
15. Dadar M., Shahali Y., Fakhri Y., Godfroid J. The global epidemiology of Brucellainfections in terrestrial wildlife: A meta-analysis. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2021;68(2):715-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13735
16. Scholz H. C., Hubalek Z., Sedláček I., Vergnaud G., Tomaso H., Al Dahouk S., Melzer F., Kämpfer P., Neubauer H., Cloeckaert A., Maguart M., Zygmunt M. S., Whatmore A. M., Falsen E., Bahn P., Göllner C., Pfeffer M., Huber B., Busse H.-J., Nöckler K. Brucella microti sp. nov., isolated from the common vole Microtus arvalis. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(2):375-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65356-0
17. Scholz H. C., Mühldorfer K., Shilton C., Benedict S., Whatmore A. M., Blom J., Eisenberg T. The change of a medically important genus: worldwide occurrence of genetically diverse novel Brucella species in exotic frogs. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168872
18. Hegazy M. Y., Abdel-Hamid N. H., Eldehiey M., Oreiby A. F., Algabbary M. H., Hamdy M. E. R., Beleta E. I., Martinez I., Shaheir M. A., Garcia N., Elthalth M. Trans-species transmission of Brucellae among ruminants hampering brucellosis control efforts in Egypt. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2022;132(1):90-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15173
19. Moreno E., Moriyón I. The Genu s Brucella. The Prokaryotes. 2006;5:315-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30745-1_17
20. Aparicio E. D. Epidemiology of brucellosis in domestic animals caused by Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis and Brucella abortus. Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International des Epizooties. 2013;32(1):53-60. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23837364/
21. Gordienko L. N., Kulikova E. V., Gaydutskaya G. M., Elantseva N. B. Phenotypic and biological properties of brucella isolated from velvet antlers of reindeer. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AICis. 2015;29(4):47-49. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23374013
22. De Figueiredo P., Ficht T. A., Rice-ficht A., Rossetti C. A., Adams L. G. Pathogenesis and Immunobiology of Brucellosis Review of Brucella e Host Interactions. The American Journal of Pathology. 2015;185(6):1505-1517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.03.003
23. Rayl N. D., Proffitt K. M., Almberg E. S., Jones J. D., Merkle J. A., Gude J. A., Cross P. C. Modeling elk to-livestock transmission risk to predict hotspots of brucellosis spillover. Wildlife Management. 2019;83(4):817-829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21645
24. Yang J. Y., Xu R., Sun H. Q. Dynamics of a seasonal brucellosis disease model with nonlocal transmission and spatial diffusion. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 2021;94:105551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105551
25. Abdisa T. Review on the Reproductive Health Problem of Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy and Veterinary Sciences. 2018;5(1):555655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19080/JDVS.2018.05.555655
26. Kiros A., Asgedom H., Abdi R. D. A Review on Bovine Brucellosis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Control Options. ARC Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AJAVS). 2016;2(3):8-21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2455-2518.0203002
27. De Macedo A. A., Galvão N. R., Sá J. C., De Carvalho da Silva A. P., Pinto da Silva Mol J., Sarmento dos Santos L., Santos R. L., De Carvalho Neta A. V. Brucella-associated cervical bursitis in cattle. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2019;51:697-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1745-x
28. Mazlan M., Khairani-Bejo S., Hamzah H., Nasruddin N. S., Salleh A., Zamri-Saad M. Pathological changes, distribution and detection of Brucella melitensis in foetuses of experimentally-infected does. Veterinary Quarterly. 2021;41(1):36-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2020.1867328
29. Maichak E. J., Scurlock B. M., Cross P. C., Rogerson J. D., Edwards W. H., Wise B., Smith S. G., Kreeger T. J. Assessment of a Strain 19 Brucellosis Vaccination Program in Elk. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2017;41(1):70-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.734
30. Aliyev J., Alakbarova M., Garayusifova A., Omarov A., Aliyeva S., Fretin D., Godfroid J. Identification and molecular characterization of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis isolated from milk in cattle in Azerbaijan. BMC Veterinary Research. 2022;18:71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03155-1
31. Alzuheir I., Al Zabadi H., Abu Helal M. Occupational Exposure Assessment and Seroprevalence of Brucella Specific Antibodies Among Veterinarians in the Northern Palestine. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2022;8:813900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.813900
32. Liu Q. H., Wei J., Sun Q. S., Wang B., Wang Y. T., Hu Y., Wu W. Detection of Brucellosis in Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) through Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP). Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2017;53(3):612-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7589/2016-05-105
33. Patra S., Tellapragada C., Vandana K. E., Mukhopadhyay C. Diagnostic utility of in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification and real-time PCR targeting virB gene for direct detection of Brucella melitensis from clinical specimens. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2019;127(1):230-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14260
34. Arakelyan P. K., Tregubov A. N., Vergun A. A., Ilin E. N., Yanchenko T. A., Dimova A. S., Borovoy V. N., Sklyarov O. D. Antiepizootic effectiveness of conjunctival immunization of cattle with a vaccine from the B. abortus 19 strain in brucellosis. Veterinariya = Veterinary. 2020;(10):9-12. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2020.23.10.09-12
35. Ivanov A. V., Salmakov K. M., Olsen S. C., Plumb G. E. A live vaccine from Brucella abortus strain 82 for control of cattle brucellosis in the Russian Federation. Animal Health Research Reviews. 2011;12(1):113-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252311000028
36. Salmakov K. M., Fomin A. M., Plotnikova E. M., Safina G. M., Galimova G. M., Salmakova A. V., Ivanov A. V., Panin A. N., Sklyarov O. D., Shumilov K. V., Klimanov A. I. Comparative study of the immunobiological properties of live brucellosis vaccines. Vaccine. 2010;28(5):35-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.050
37. Wang S., Zhao X., Sun K., Bateer H., Wang W. The Genome Sequence of Brucella abortus vaccine strain A19 provides insights on its virulence attenuation compared to Brucella abortus strain. Gene. 2022;830:146521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2022.146521
38. Yuzhakov A. A., Layshev K. A., Detter G. F., Zuev S. M. Selection and breeding work in the northern reindeer husbandry of the arctic regions of the russian federation. Veterinariya i kormlenie. 2021;(4):59-62. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2021-4-17
39. Gordienko L. N., Novikov A. N., Kulikova E. V. effectiveness of the differential test at using in the diagnostics of reindeer brucellosis. Veterinariya = Veterinary. 2020;(11):7-10. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2020.23.11.07-10
40. Layshev K. A., Zabrodin V. A., Prokudin A. V., Vinokurov N. V., Sleptsov E. S. Problems of prevention of brucellosis of reindeer and ways of their solution. Genetika i razvedenie zhivotnykh = Genetics and breeding of animals. 2018;(1):37-45. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31043/2410-2733-2018-1-37-45
41. De Alencar Mota A. L. A., Ferreira F., Ferreira Neto J. S., Dias R. A., Amaku M., Grisi-Filho J. H. H., Telles E. O., Conçalves V. S. P. Large-scale study of herd-level risk factors for bovine brucellosis in Brazil. Acta Tropica. 2016;164:226-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.09.016
42. Franc K. A., Krecek R. C., Häsler B. N., Arenas-Gamboa A. M. Brucellosis remains a neglected disease in the developing world: a call for interdisciplinary action. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-5016-y
43. Dorneles E. M. S., Sriranganathan N., Lage A. P. Recent advances in Brucella abortus vaccines. Veterinary Research. 2015;46:76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0199-7
44. Asakura S., Makingi G., Kazwala R., Makita K. Brucellosis Risk in Urban and Agro-pastoral Areas in Tanzania. Ecohealth. 2018;15(1):41-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1308-z
45. Avila-Granados L. M., Garcia-Gonzalez D. G., Zambrano-Varon J. L., Anrenas-Gamboa A. M. Brucellosis in Colombia: Current Status and Challenges in the Control of an Endemic Disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2019;6:321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00321
Review
For citations:
Zakharova O.I., Burova O.A., Iashin I.V., Blokhin A.A. Epizootic situation for brucellosis in the Russian Federation (review). Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2023;24(1):20-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2023.24.1.20-29
Views:
1006
Email this article 