Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

Feed phyto-additive from Leucea safflower (Rhaponticum carthamoides) and its use in young laying hens

https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2025.26.5.1085-1097

Abstract

The aim of the research was to study the content of 20-hydroxyecdysone in phyto-additive from Leucea safflower and its effect on metabolic processes in young laying hens of the Lohmann Brown Light cross. The concentration of 20-hydroxyecdysone in phyto-supplement under study was 0.40±0.05 % on absolutely dry matter. Phyto-additive from the green mass of Leucea safflower was included into the compound feed from the 2nd to the 23rd week of growing young laying hens: at a rate of 3,0 % in the first experimental group and 6,0 % in the second group, based on the dry matter content of the feed. The duration of feeding was 154 days. As a result of the experiment, it was revealed that the young laying hens of the first and second experimental groups had higher digestibility coefficients compared to the analogues of the control group: of dry matter by 3.20 and 7.21 % (p<0.01), of organic matter by 2.90 % (p><0.05) and 5.70 % (p><0.01), of crude protein – by 5.68 and 7.47 % (p><0.05), of crude fat – by 4.60 and 6.07 % (p><0.05), of crude fiber – by 4.94 and 8.14 % (p><0.05), and of nitrogen-free extractive substances – by 1.36 and 2.31 %, respectively. The coefficients of nitrogen assimilation in poultry of the experimental groups were higher by 1.89 р. р. (p><0.01) and 4.58 р. р. (p><0.001), respectively. In the young laying hens of the first and second experimental groups, the coefficients of calcium and phosphorus utilization were higher, compared with the poultry of the control group, by 1.42 р. р. (p><0.05) and by 3.57 р. р., 1.44 р. р. and 3.50 р. р., respectively. The level of total protein in the blood of young laying hens of the first and second experimental groups was at the upper limit of normal and was higher by 9.13 % (p><0.05) and 12.22 % (p><0.01), respectively, compared with the control. The live weight of young chickens in the first and second experimental groups at the end of the experiment, was 101.02 % and 105.52 %, respectively, relative to the control. In order to improve the metabolic processes in the body of the poultry, it is more appropriate to include a feed phyto-additive from Leucea safflower in the amount of 6.0 % (in% to the weight of the dry matter of the feed) in the structure of compound feeds for young laying hens. Keywords: compound feed, digestibility, phytoecdysteroids, balance of nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus, carotene, 20-hydroxyecdysone> < 0.01), of organic matter by 2.90 % (p < 0.05) and 5.70 % (p < 0.01), of crude protein – by 5.68 and 7.47 % (p < 0.05), of crude fat – by 4.60 and 6.07 % (p < 0.05), of crude fiber – by 4.94 and 8.14 % (p < 0.05), and of nitrogen-free extractive substances – by 1.36 and 2.31 %, respectively. The coefficients of nitrogen assimilation in poultry of the experimental groups were higher by 1.89 р. р. (p < 0.01) and 4.58 р. р. (p < 0.001), respectively. In the young laying hens of the first and second experimental groups, the coefficients of calcium and phosphorus utilization were higher, compared with the poultry of the control group, by 1.42 р. р. (p < 0.05) and by 3.57 р. р., 1.44 р. р. and 3.50 р. р., respectively. The level of total protein in the blood of young laying hens of the first and second experimental groups was at the upper limit of normal and was higher by 9.13 % (p < 0.05) and 12.22 % (p < 0.01), respectively, compared with the control. The live weight of young chickens in the first and second experimental groups at the end of the experiment, was 101.02 % and 105.52 %, respectively, relative to the control. In order to improve the metabolic processes in the body of the poultry, it is more appropriate to include a feed phyto-additive from Leucea safflower in the amount of 6.0 % (in% to the weight of the dry matter of the feed) in the structure of compound feeds for young laying hens.

About the Authors

N. A. Morozkov
Perm Research Institute of Agriculture –division of the Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Nikolay A. Morozkov, PhD in Agricultural Science, senior researcher, the Laboratory of Agricultural Technologies,

12, Kultury St., Lobanovo, Perm district, Perm Region, 614532



E. V. Lepikhina
Perm Research Institute of Agriculture –division of the Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Elena V. Lepikhina, PhD in Agricultural Science, researcher, the Laboratory of Biologically Active Feed,

12, Kultury St., Lobanovo, Perm district, Perm Region, 614532



I. N. Zhdanova
Perm Research Institute of Agriculture –division of the Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Irina N. Zhdanova, PhD in Veterinary Science, senior researcher, the Laboratory of Biologically Active Feed,

12, Kultury St., Lobanovo, Perm district, Perm Region, 614532



N. V. Avdeev
Perm Research Institute of Agriculture –division of the Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Nikolay V. Avdeev, PhD in Biological Science, Head of the Laboratory of Biologically Active Feeds,

12, Kultury St., Lobanovo, Perm district, Perm Region, 614532



V. A. Sitnikov
Perm State Agro-Technological University named after academician D. N. Pryanishnikov
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Sitnikov, PhD in Agricultural Science, associate professor, associate professor at the Department of Zootechnology,

23 Petropavlovskaya str., Perm, 614990



References

1. Ovchinnikov A. A. The influence of feed additives on the body’s defenses in replacement young animals and laying hens. Izvestiya Kabardino-Balkarskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta im. V. M. Kokova. 2024;(2(44)):59–67. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.55196/2411-3492-2024-2-44-59-67

2. Shatskikh E. V., Latypova E. N. Blood parameters and productivity of chickens when using phytobiotic preparations in the diet. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala = Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2023;23(8):78‒88. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2023-237-08-78-88

3. Morozkov N. А., Sukhanova E. V., Kaigorodov R. V., Zhdanova I. N., Terentyeva L. S. The effectiveness of using plant-based feed supplement made of Astragalus cicer in the diets of laying hens. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2024;25(4):664–673. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.4.664-673

4. Dinan L., Mamadalieva N. Z., Lafont R. Dietary Phytoecdysteroids. Handbook of Dietary Phytochemicals. 2020;79:1–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1745-3_35-1

5. Ivanovsky A. A., Latushkina N. A. Experimental phytobiotic Phytostimplus and its application to calves. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2023;24(3):478-486. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2023.24.3.478-486

6. Gioia F. D., Petropoulos S. А. Сhapter seven-phytoestrogens, phytosteroids and saponins in vegetables: biosynthesis, functions, health effects and practical applications. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. 2019;90:351–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2019.02.004

7. Buniam J., Chukijrungroat N., Rattanavichit Y., Surapongchai J., Weerachayaphorn J., Bupha-Intr T., Saengsirisuwan V. 20-Hydroxyecdysone ameliorates metabolic and cardiovascular dysfunction in high-fathigh-fructose-fed ovariectomized rats. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. 2020;20(1):140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-02936-1

8. Khaziev D., Galina C., Gadiev R., Valitov F., Gumarova G., Galyautdinov I. Phytoecdisteroids from Serratula coronata when growing ducklings. Research in Veterinary Science. 2020;128:170–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.11.012

9. Morozkov N. A., Sukhanova E. V., Zhdanova I. N., Punegov V. V. The effect of different doses of fodder additive from leuzea on calves. Veterinariya i kormlenie. 2023;(7):46–50. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2023-7-11

10. Morozkov N. A., Terentyeva L. S., Sukhanova E. V., Voloshin V. A. Vitamin-herbal flour from Rhaponticum carthamoides in the diets of dairy cows. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2021;22(4):570–580. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2021.22.4.570-580

11. Dinan L., Dioh W., Veillet S., Lafont R. 20-Hydroxyecdysone, from Plant Extracts to Clinical Use: Therapeutic Potential for the Treatment of Neuromuscular, Cardio-Metabolic and Respiratory Diseases. Biomedicines. 2021;9(5):492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050492

12. Ivanovsky A. A. The effect of phytobiotic with F. ulmaria extract on the clinical and hematological status of postmilk calves. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2025;26(2):396–403. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2025.26.2.396-403

13. Kostomakhin N., Ivanov A. Herbal flour – protein and vitamin food. Kombikorma. 2013;(6):71–73. (In Russ.).

14. Todorova V., Savova M. S., Ivanova S., Ivanov K., Georgiev M. I. Anti-Adipogenic Activity of Rhaponticum carthamoides and Its Secondary Metabolites. Nutrients. 2023;15(13):3061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15133061

15. Karusevich A. A., Buzuk G. N. Application of aluminium oxide in the purification of water-alcohol extraction from rhaponticum carthamoides leaves. Vestnik farmatsii. 2016;(1(71)):48–54. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25767445

16. Parr M. K., Ambrosio G., Wuest B., Mazzarino M., de la Torre X., Sibilia F. et al. Targeting the administration of ecdysterone in doping control samples. Forensic Toxicology. 2020;38:172–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-019-00504-y

17. Timofeev N. P. Experience of Rhaponticum carthamoides (Willd.) Iliin cultivation as a natural source of ecdysterone under the conditions of the Arkhangelsk region. Sel'skokhozyaystvennaya biologiya = Agricultural Biology. 2023;58(1):114–141. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2023.1.114rus

18. Bathori M., Toth N., Hunyadi A., Marki A., Zador E. Phytoecdysteroids and anabolic-androgenic steroids – structure and effects on humans. Current Medical Chemistry. 2008;15(1):75–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/092986708783330674

19. Gorelick-Feldman J., Maclean D., Ilic N., Poulev A., Lila M. A., Cheng D., Raskin I. Phytoecdysteroids increase protein synthesis in skeletal muscle cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008;56(10):3532–3537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf073059z

20. Dioh W., Tourette C., Del Signore S., Daudigny L., Balducci C., Dupont P. et al. A Phase 1 study for safety and pharmacokinetics of BIO101 (20-hydroxyecdysone) in healthy young and older adults. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. 2023;14(3):1259–1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.13195

21. Salomatin V. V., Ryadnov A. A., Ryadnova T. A., Ryadnova Yu. A. The effect of fir-tree based bioactive additive on the morphological and biochemical blood parameters in broilers. Ptitsevodstvo. 2021;(3):45–49. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2021-70-3-45-49

22. Loretts O. G., Gorelik O. V., Zyablitseva M. A., Belookov A. A. Dynamics of morphological and biochemical parameters of blood of chickens-broilers at use in diets of microbiological preparations. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala = Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2017;(11(165)):25–31. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32299264

23. Vakhrusheva T. I. Biochemical and morphological chicken blood indices under the influence of protein meal of leuzea, rosewort and enterophar. Vestnik KrasGAU = The Bulletin of KrasGAU. 2014;(6(93)):206–210. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21974519

24. Shchetinina S. Yu. The importance of mineral substances for human health. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2024;(4-4(91)):27–31. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2024-4-4-27-31

25. Timofeev N. P. New technology and production efficiency of high-quality plant raw materials rhaponticum carthamoides [anabolic and immune-stimulating effects of low doses leuzea carthamoides in animal industry]. New and non-traditional plants and prospects for their practical use: Proceedings of the III International Conference. The Symposium. Moscow: RASKhN, 1999. Vol. 3. pp. 465–467. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32412631


Review

For citations:


Morozkov N.A., Lepikhina E.V., Zhdanova I.N., Avdeev N.V., Sitnikov V.A. Feed phyto-additive from Leucea safflower (Rhaponticum carthamoides) and its use in young laying hens. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2025;26(5):1085-1097. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2025.26.5.1085-1097

Views: 8


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)