Genotypic differences in the response of spring barley leaf pigment complex to foliar nitrogen application
https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2026.27.1.117-128
Abstract
The purpose of the work is to identify varietal differences in the response of the pigment complex of barley plant leaves to top-dressing with nitrogen-containing preparations. The research was carried out in 2020–2023 in the field experiment on sod-podzolic medium-loamy soil in the conditions of the Kirov region. The effect of nitrogen-containing preparations CAS 28 (N 360 g/l) and Polydon Amino Start (N 130 g/l) on the accumulation of pigments in two upper leaves of plants of ‘Novichok’, ‘Rodnik Prikamya’, and ‘Pamyaty Rodinoy’ cultivars was studied. It was found that foliar treatments with the studied preparations can significantly change the content of green and yellow leaf pigments depending on the growing conditions and specific plant genotype (Chl a – 67–111%; Chl b – 83–118 %; carotenoids – 80–128 % relative to the control without treatment). Of 72 test variants (3 cultivars, 2 treatments, 4 years, 3 types of pigments), changes were noted in 56 variants for the flag leaf, but only in 19 variants for the second leaf. With the significant difference in the nitrogen content of the preparations used, the difference in their effect on the chlorophyll content was only a few percent. So, in 2020 for the ‘Novichok’ cultivar the content of Chl a in a flag leaf increased by 8 % under the use of CAS 28 and by 6 % with Amino Start. In 2022 CAS 28 increased the Chl a content in the flag leaf of the ‘Rodnik Prikamya’ cultivar by 8 %, but Amino Start decreased it by 4 % relative to the control. For ‘Pamyaty Rodinoy’ cultivar in 2020, a negative effect of CAS 28 (-6 % of the control) and a positive effect for Amino Start (+5 % of the control) were noted. The conditions of one and the same year can increase the effect of preparations on the accumulation of pigments for one cultivar, but reduce it for another. In 2020 and 2022 CAS 28 increased the content of Chl a in flag leaves of the cv. ‘Novichok’ (by 8.3–10.4 %) and ‘Rodnik Prikamya’ (by 7.9–9.1 %), but reduced in cv. ‘Pamyaty Rodinoy’ (by 6.2–10.5 %); Amino Start in 2020 increased the content of Chl b in flag leaves of the cv. ‘Novichok’ and ‘Pamyaty Rodinoy’ (by 10.7–11.7 %), but reduced it the cv. ‘Rodnik Prikamya’ (by 9.6 %). In general, the effect of foliar treatment with nitrogen-containing preparations on the content of flag leaf pigments was determined both by the weather conditions of vegetation (from 14.5 to 41.7 %) and by the genotype of the cultivar (from 1.5 to 14.0 %). With regard to the accumulation of photosynthetic pigments for the cv. ‘Novichok’, the use of top-dressing with both preparations is effective (especially in adverse weather conditions at the flowering phase), with CAS 28 for cv. ‘Rodnik Prikamya’, with Amino Start for cv. ‘Pamyaty Rodinoy’.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. N. NoskovaRussian Federation
Evgeniya N. Noskova, PhD in Agricultural Science, senior researcher, the Laboratory of Crop Farming, Agrochemistry and Forage Production
166-a Lenin str., Kirov, 610007
E. M. Lisitsyn
Russian Federation
Eugene M. Lisitsyn, DSc in Biology, Head of the Department of Plant Edaphic Resistance
166-a Lenin str., Kirov, 610007
References
1. Guo Z. P., Dong K., Zhu J. H., Dong Y. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and intercropping on faba bean rust occurrence and field microclimate. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences. 2019;33(11):2294–2302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.11.2294
2. Zhang Z., Hu Z., Xie S., Riaz A., Zhang G., Ye L. Natural Variation in NIN-LIKE PROTEIN 4 Associated With Spike-Response to Nitrogen in Barley. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2025;48(7):5120–5132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.15497
3. Singh B., Buresh R. J., Peng S. Synchronizing nitrogen fertilizer application to crop nitrogen needs. Chapter from: Ladha J. K. (ed.) in book: Improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop production. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 2024. pp. 167–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2024.0135.10
4. Singh B., Sidhu A. S., Singh K., Kaur S. Implication of rate and time of nitrogen application on nitrogen status of barley plant in light textured soils. Journal of Agricultural Physics. 2024;24(2):307–312. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388614320_Implication_of_Rate_and_Time_of_Nitrogen_Application_on_Nitrogen_Status_of_Barley_Plant_in_Light_Textured_Soils
5. Jeager A., Zannin E., Sahin A. W., Arendt E. K. Barley protein properties, extraction and applications, with a focus on brewers’ spent grain protein. Foods. 2021;10(6):1389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061389
6. Peng S., Cassman K. G., Kropff M. J. Relationship between leaf photosynthesis and nitrogen content of field-grown rice in the tropics. Crop Science. 1995;35(6):1627–1630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500060018x
7. Ionova E. V., Gaze V. L., Likhovidova V. A. Photosynthetic activity and dynamics of dry mass of plants accumulation of winter soft wheat, depending on growing conditions. Zernovoye khozyaystvo Rossii = Grain Economy of Russia. 2020;(1):23–27. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2020-67-1-23-27
8. Alazmani A. Evaluation of yield and yield components of barley varieties to nitrogen. The Intlernational Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 2015;8(1):52–54. URL: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20153141840
9. Hamann F. A., Fiebig A., Noga G. Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Chlorophyll Content and Yield of Barley Cultivars Assessed by Fluorescence-Based Approaches. Canadian Journal of Agriculture and Crops. 2020;5(2):138–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/803.5.2.138.152
10. Trubnikov Yu. N., Shpedt A. A., Solomennikova Yu. N. Photometric express diagnostics of nitrogen nutrition of plants. Vestnik KraSGAU = The Bulletin of KrasGAU. 2023;(11):165–172. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2023-11-165-172
11. Lichtenthaler H. K., Buschmann C. Extraction of Phtosynthetic Tissues:Chlorophylls and Carotenoids. Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2001. pp. F4.2.1–F4.2.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.faf0402s01
12. Lichtenthaler Н. К., Buschmann C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2001. pp. F4.3.1–F4.3.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.faf0403s01
13. Ponomareva A. S., Korshunov A. A., Voznesenskaya T. Yu., Ri-zhova D. A. Efficiency of application of organomineral fertilizers with the complex of amino acids on wheat. Agrokhimichesky vestnik = Agrochemical Herald. 2019;(1):59–62. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2516-2019-10014
14. Semenyuk O. V., Galushko N. A. Effect of Polydon® Amino preparations on the productivity and quality of winter wheat under conditions of the North Caucasus region. Tavrichesky vestnik agrarnoy nauki = Taurida herald of the agrarian sciences. 2022;(4(32)):202–211. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49982575
15. Noskova E. N., Lisitsyn E. M., Shchennikova I. N., Svetlakova E. V. Top-dressing treatment of spring barley to modify its quality. Foods and Raw Materials. 2023;11(1):106–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2023-1-562
16. Sundaram P. K., Mani I., Lande S. D., Parray R. A. Evaluation of urea ammonium nitrate application on the performance of wheat. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019;8(1):1956–1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.205
17. Kizilgeci F., Yildirim M., Islam M. S., Ratnasekera D., Iqbal M. A., Sabagh A. E. Normalized difference vegetation index and chlorophyll content for precision nitrogen management in durum wheat cultivars under semi-arid conditions. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):3725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073725
18. Ghosh M., Swain D. K., Jha M. K., Tewari V. K., Bohra A. Optimizing chlorophyll meter (SPAD) reading to allow efficient nitrogen use in rice and wheat under rice-wheat cropping system in eastern India. Plant Production Science. 2020;23(1):270–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2020.1717970
19. Batalova G. A., Lisitsin E. M., Vologzhanina E. N., Zhuravleva G. P. Effect of timing and dosage of “KAS 28” application on oat plants development. Tavrichesky vestnik agrarnoy nauki = Taurida herald of the agrarian sciences. 2021;(4(28)):9–21. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33952/2542-0720-2021-4-28-9-21
20. Muhammad I., Yang L., Ahmad S., Farooq S., Al-Ghamdi A. A., Khan A. et al. Nitrogen Fertilizer Modulates Plant Growth, Chlorophyll Pigments and Enzymatic Activities under Different Irrigation Regimes. Agronomy 2022;12(4):845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040845
21. Voronkova N. A., Volkova V. A., Tsiganova N. A., Balabanova N. F. The content of chlorophyll in the leaves of spring soft wheat, depending on the root nutrition with macro-fertilizers and foliar growth stimulants. Plodorodie. 2022;(1):17–21. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25680/S19948603.2022.124.05
22. Seadh S. E., El-Abady M. I., El-Ghamry A. M., Farouk S. Influence of micronutrients foliar application and nitrogen fertilization on wheat yield and quality of grain and seed. Journal of Biological. Sciences. 2009;9(8):851–858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2009.851.858
23. Noskova E. N., Lisitsyn E. M. Effect of top-dressing on chlorophyll content in barley leaves and its relation to grain quality parameters. Agrokhimiya. 2024;(4):49–59. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188124040062
Review
For citations:
Noskova E.N., Lisitsyn E.M. Genotypic differences in the response of spring barley leaf pigment complex to foliar nitrogen application. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2026;27(1):117-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2026.27.1.117-128
JATS XML






























