Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

The criterion of significance of general adaptive ability: numerical model

https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2018.66.5.34-39

Abstract

The aims of the study: 1) to give an example of calculating the criterion for evaluation the collection of air-dry matter of the new red clover variety (Trifolium pratense L.) Pochinkovets in a competitive variety test; 2) to compare the general adaptive ability (GAA) of the selection achievement with other evaluation criteria. The initial data for the statistical processing were obtained from 2013 to 2015 in the breeding crop rotation of the Smolensk State Agricultural Experimental Station named after A.N. Engelhardt. The soil of test plots is sod-medium podzol light loamy with a medium acidic reaction, low content of humus, high content of mobile phosphorus and medium mobile potassium level. The wintering conditions varied from favorable to causing snow cover fracture, with low negative temperatures effect coming next. The vegetative periods were characterized by an elevated temperature. The moisture regime varied from optimal to semi-arid. Four selective numbers were tested: Pochinkovets variety (S-434), S-439, R-4 (from Smolensk State Agricultural Experimental Station named after A.N. Engelhardt) and No. 359 (France). The variety Smolensky 29 was the standard. The least significant difference in GAA at alpha level of 0.05 was 0.49 t/ha of air-dry matter. Two selective numbers were chosen. They are S-434 (Pochinkovets) and No. 359 (with GAA 0.92 and 0.83 t/ha of air-dry matter respectively). The GAA of the standard was 1.01 t/ha (significantly low). The S-434 (Pochinkovets) variety was more stable than No. 359. Its specific adaptive ability equal to 3.30 was lower than that of No. 359 (5.05). For this reason, the selection value of the genotype S-434 (Pochinkovets) equal to 4.88 was higher than that of No. 359 (3.00). Based on the positive results of the competitive test, the new Pochinkovets variety was passed to the State varietal test. Since 2018 it has been included into the State Register of Selection Achievements. The new statistical criterion was successfully tested during the red clover selection process.

About the Authors

E. S. Rekashus
Smolensk state agricultural experimental station named by A.N. Engelhardt
Russian Federation


O. V. Kurdakova
Smolensk state agricultural experimental station named by A.N. Engelhardt
Russian Federation


References

1. Нагибин А.Е., Тормозин Н.А., Зырянцева А.А. Новый сорт клевера лугового (Trifolium pratense L.) Добряк // Кормопроизводство. 2016. № 12. С. 37-39.

2. Онучина О.Л., Грипась М.Н., Арзамасова Е.Г., Попова Е.В., Корнева И.А. Новый сорт клевера лугового Шанс // Аграрная наука ЕвроСеверо-Востока. 2017. № 6 (61). С. 20-24.

3. Дыцкова Т.А., Курдакова О.В. Клевер луговой сорт Надежный // Плодоводство и ягодоводство России. 2014. Т. 40. № 1. С. 122-125.

4. Зарьянова З.А., Цуканова З.Р., Кирюхин С.В. Особенности хозяйственных и биологических признаков нового сорта клевера лугового Сувенир // Зернобобовые и крупяные культуры. 2015. №3(15). С. 30-34.

5. Кильчевский А.В., Хотылева Л.В. Методы оценки адаптивной способности и стабильности генотипов, дифференцирующей способности среды. Сообщение 1. Обоснование метода // Генетика. 1985. Т. 21. № 9. С. 1481-1490.

6. Методические указания по селекции и первичному семеноводству клевера / под ред. З.Ш. Шамсутдинова, А.С. Новоселовой, С.А. Бекузаровой. М.: Типография Россельхозакадемии, 2002. 72 с.

7. Методика государственного сортоиспытания сельскохозяйственных культур: Вып. 1. Общая часть / под общ. ред. М.А. Федина. М., 1985. 269 с.

8. Методика государственного сортоиспытания сельскохозяйственных культур: Вып. 2. Зерновые, крупяные, зернобобовые, кукуруза и кормовые культуры. М., 1989. 195 с.

9. Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта: С основами статистической обработки результатов исследований. М.: Колос, 1979. 416 с.

10. Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties // Crop Science. 1966. Vol. 6. No 1. P. 36-40.

11. Кильчевский А.В., Хотылева Л.В. Методы оценки адаптивной способности и стабильности генотипов, дифференцирующей способности среды. Сообщение 2. Числовой пример и обсуждение // Генетика. 1985. Т. 21. № 9. С. 1491-1498.


Review

For citations:


Rekashus E.S., Kurdakova O.V. The criterion of significance of general adaptive ability: numerical model. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2018;66(5):34-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2018.66.5.34-39

Views: 559


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)