Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

Assessment of the ecological plasticity and stability of black currant cultivars in the Central Chernozem Region

https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2026.27.4.841-849

Abstract

The aim of the research was to assess the ecological plasticity and stability of 14 domestic black currant cultivars of the bio resource collection of the Russian Research Institute of Fruit Crop Breeding using “yield” as the key trait. The work was carried out in 2023–2025 in the Orel Region (Central Chernozem Region). ‘Orlovskaya Serenada’, a black currant cultivar zoned in the Central Chernozem Region, was taken as a control. It was found that 2023 was the most favorable year for growing black currant (the environment index (Ii) – 0.54), while 2024 and 2025 were less favorable (Ii = -0.12 and -0.42, respectively). As a result of the study, there were identified 5 cultivars that significantly exceeded the reference cultivar in terms of yield during the study years: ‘Binar’,’Shaman’, ‘Zhuravushka’, ‘Kanakhama’, and ‘Streletz’ (6.30–7.34 t/ha). According to the regression coefficient, the intensive cultivars (bi>1) included ‘Binar’, ‘Shaman’, ‘Shuravushka’, ‘Streletz’, ‘Nezhdanchik’, ‘Arkadia’, and ‘Dobry Dzhinn’, at the same time, ‘Shaman’ had the highest level of plasticity (bi = 2.10). ‘Yulian’, ‘Avgustinka’, ‘Udaletz’ and ‘Ruslan’ were the neutral type cultivars (bi<1). ‘Vympel’ cultivar (bi ≈ 0) did not respond to changes in the environment. The control ‘Orlovskaya Serenada’ as well as 'Zhemchuzhina' and 'Kanakhama' were characterized by the full compliance of the cultivar with the growing conditions and their changes. According to the ecological stability index (𝝈𝒅𝟐) the cultivars ‘Avgustinka’, ‘Yulian’, and ‘Vympel’ were identified as the most stable among those studied; however, their yield did not exceed that of the control cultivar. Among the high-yielding cultivars, ‘Shaman’, ‘Kanakhama’, and ‘Streletz’ were the most stable. According to the method used, the optimal profile for a productive cultivar is a combination of bi equal to or close to 1 and a minimum environmental stability parameter 𝝈𝒅𝟐. The ‘Kanakhama’ cultivar was identified with this combination of statistical parameters (bi = 0.9; 𝝈𝒅𝟐 = 5.28), which would be considered as a stable-yielding cultivar (6.73 t/ha, CV = 22.24 %) and would be of interest as a source for breeding stable-yielding black currant cultivars.

About the Authors

M. А. Keldibekova
Russian Research Institute of Fruit Crop Breeding
Russian Federation

Margarita A. Keldibekova, PhD in Agricultural Science, Scientific Secretary, senior researcher, the Laboratory of Breeding and Variety Study of Currants

Zhilina village, Orel municipal district, Orel region, 302530



S. D. Knyazev
Russian Research Institute of Fruit Crop Breeding
Russian Federation

Sergey D. Knyazev, DSc in Agricultural Science, professor, Director, chief researcher, the Laboratory of Breeding and Variety Study of Currants

Zhilina village, Orel municipal district, Orel region, 302530



References

1. Velibekova L. A. Providing the population of Russia with domestic fruit and berry products. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoy sel'skokhozyaystvennoy akademii = Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2023;(4):157–171. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26897/0021-342X-2023-4-157-171

2. Akimov M. Yu., Zhbanova E. V. Berry crops as sources of functional ingredients for the healthy food industry. Plodovodstvo = Fruit Growing. 2025;37:203–208. (In Russ.). URL: https://fruit.belal.by/jour/article/view/788

3. Knyazev S. D., Keldibekova M. A., Tovarnitskaya M. V. Comparative evaluation of new varieties of black currant breeding all Russian research institute of fruit crop breeding. Vestnik agrarnoy nauki = Bulletin of agrarian science. 2017;(5):36–40. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15217/issn2587-666X.2017.5.36

4. Chebotok E. M. Popolneniye sortimenta chërnoy smorodiny dlya Volgo-Vyatskogo regiona. Sovremennoye sadovodstvo = Cotemporary horticulture. 2020;(1):10–15. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2312-6701-2020-10102

5. Pereira H. S., Alvares R. C., Silva F. C., de Faria L. C., Melo L. C. Genetic, environmental and genotype x environment interaction effects on the common bean grain yield and commercial quality. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias. 2017;38(3):1241–1250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1241

6. Batakova O. B., Korelina V. A. Assessment of yield, plasticity and stability of spring barley cultivars grown in the European North of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Agrono-miya i zhivotnovodstvo = RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries. 2021;16(2):118–128. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2021-16-2-118-128

7. Admas S., Tesfaye K. Genotype-byenvironment interaction and yield stability analysis in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) genotypes in North Shewa, Ethiopia. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Agriculture and Environ-ment. 2017;9(1)82–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ausae-2017-0008

8. Detsyna A. A., Illarionova I. V., Shcherbinina V. O. Calculation of parameters of ecological plasticity and stability of oil sunflower varieties bred in VNIIMK. Maslichnyye kul'tury = Oil crops. 2020;(3(183)):31–38. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25230/2412-608Х-2020-3-183-31-38

9. Potanin V. G., Aleynikov A. F., Stepochkin P. I. A new approach to estimation of the ecological plasticity of plant varieties. Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2014;18(3):548–552. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22479667

10. Fokin S. A., Kurkova I. V. Assessment of the ecological plasticity of spring wheat of the DalGAU 1 variety depending on micronutrient application. Vestnik Kurganskoy GSKHA. 2023;(3(47)):13–19. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=56178507

11. Nebroy K. Yu. Modern directions in black currant breeding research and possible ways of their implementation. Sovremennoye sadovodstvo = Cotemporary horticulture. 2023;(1):15–30. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52415/23126701_2023_0102

12. Zykin V. A., Belan I. A. Ecological plasticity of agricultural plants (methodology and assessment). Ufa, 2011. 97 p.

13. Sazonov F. F. Evaluation of black currant breeding cultivars of the FSBSO FSC of horticulture according to statistical adaptability indicators. Vestnik KrasGAU = The Bulletin of KrasGAU. 2024;(11):64–70. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2024-11-64-70

14. Gasymov F., Galimov V., Lezin M. Ekologicheskaya plastichnost' sortov vishni v usloviyakh Yuzhnogo Urala. 3i: intellect, idea, innovation-intellekt, ideya, innovatsiya. 2022;(1):17–23. (In Kazakhstan). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52269/22266070_2022_1_17

15. Dakhno T. G., Dakhno O. A. Assessment of a large-fruited strawberry varieties ecological plasticity and stability in terms of productivity and fruit quality. Vestnik rossiyskoy sel'skokhozyaystvennoy nauki = Vestnik of the Russian agricultural science. 2021;(3):40–43. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30850/vrsn/2021/3/40-43

16. Vasiliev A. A., Gasymov F. M. Environmental plasticity of various plum cultivars under the conditions of Chelyabinsk province. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selektsii = Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2019;180(2):25–29. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2019-2-25-29


Review

For citations:


Keldibekova M.А., Knyazev S.D. Assessment of the ecological plasticity and stability of black currant cultivars in the Central Chernozem Region. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2026;27(4):841-849. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2026.27.4.841-849

Views: 234

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)