The efficiency of Profort additive in feeding cows during the period of increasing the milk yield
https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2019.20.5.478-487
Abstract
The article provides data on the use of Profort feed probiotic additive containing strains of Enterococcus faecium and Bacillus subtilis bacteria in feeding cows during the period of increasing the milk yield. The research was conducted in 2019 on the basis of Agricultural Production Cooperative Collective farm "Iskra", Kirov region. Two groups of highly productive black-and-white motley cows with the average milk yield of 7500 kg for a lactation of 20 animals each were formed for the experiment. The morphological composition and immuno-biochemical parameters of blood of the experimental animals as well as milk productivity and quality indicators of milk were studied, the economic efficiency of Profort probiotic additive use was calculated. It has been established that the inclusion of Profort additive into the animal diet at a dose of 30 g per head per day during 80 days of the period of increasing the milk yield contributes to the normalization of metabolic processes in their bodies, increasing the average daily milk yield by 9.04 – 12.86% (P<0.05), an increase in the percentage of fat and protein in milk by 0.03-0.10%, respectively, compared with the similar indicators of animals in the control group. When using Profort, from the cows of the experimental group in the first three months of lactation 72785.08 kg of milk in a basic fat content of 3.4% were ob-tained, that was 10580.37 kg of milk more as compared with the milk yield of animals from the control group for the same period (62204.71 kg). It allowed to increase the revenue from the sale of milk by 17.01%, to reduce the cost of production of 1 kg of milk by 2 rubles or 11.76% and to get 6.04 rubles of additional profit for each ruble of additional costs. The increase in profit and reduction in the cost of milk production contributed to an increase in profitability by 18.01%.
Keywords
Enterococcus faecium,
Bacillus subtilis,
hematological parameters,
milk production,
economic efficiency
Supporting agencies: the research was carried out within the state assignment of the Federal Agricultural Research Center of the North-East named N. V. Rudnitsky (theme № 0767-2019-0088) and according to the research plan of the Department of Zoohygiene, Physiology and Biochemistry of the Vyatka State Agricultural Academy (state registration № 01201176109).
About the Authors
A. V. Filatov
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Vyatka State Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DSc in Veterinary, professor at the Department of Zoohygiene, Physiology and Biochemistry
Oktyabrsky Avenue, 133, Kirov, Russian Federation, 610017
fav6819@yandex.ru
N. A. Shemuranova
Federal Agricultural Research Center of the North-East named N. V. Rudnitsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Agricultural science, head of the Laboratory of feeding farm animals, senior researcher
Lenin str., 166a, Kirov, Russian Federation, 610007
priemnaya@fanc-sv.ru
A. F. Sapozhnikov
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Vyatka State Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Veterinary, associate professor at the Department of Diagnostics, Therapy, Morphology and Pharmacology
Oktyabrsky Avenue, 133, Kirov, Russian Federation, 610017
info@vgsha.info
References
1. Kosilov V. I., Mironova I. V. Potreblenie pitatel'nykh veshchestv i balans azota u korov cherno-pestroy porody pri vvedenii v ikh ratsion probioticheskogo preparata Vetosporin-aktiv. [Nutrient consumption and nitrogen balance in cows of black-motley breed by addition of Vetosporin-active probiotic preparation into the diet]. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2015;(3 (53)):122-124. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23828379
2. Roche J. R., Friggens N. C., Kay J. K., Fisher M. W., Stafford K. J., Berry D. P. Invited review: Body condi-tion score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92 (12):5769-5801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2431
3. Soldatova V. V., Sobolev D. V., Novikova N. I., Il'ina L. A., Filippova V. A., Gorbacheva E. E., Mov-sisyan A. G. Vliyanie kormovoy dobavki Profort® na mikrofloru rubtsa i produktivnost' doynykh koz. [The effect of Profort® feed additive on the microflora of rumen and productivity of milking goats]. Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo = Journal of Dairy and Beef Cattle Farming. 2018;(5):24-27. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru /item.asp?id=35606279
4. Butler W. R. Energy balance relationships with follicular development, ovulation and fertility in post-partum dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003;83:211-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00112-X
5. Laptev G., Novikova N., Selivanov D., Soldatova V., Bol'shakov V. Profort® v kormlenii korov. [Profort® in feeding cows]. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. 2017;(2):46-47. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30006665
6. Butler W. R., Smith R. D. Interrelationship between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1989;72:767-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79169-4
7. Stein T. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;56(4):845-857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x
8. Fenwick M. A., Llewellyn S., Fitzpatrick R., Kenny D. A., Murphy J. J., Patton J., Wathes D. C. Negative energy balance in dairy cows is associated with specific changes in IGF-binding protein expression in the oviduct. Reproduction. 2008;135:63-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00064.2009
9. Awais M., Pervez A., Yaqub Asim, Shah M. M. Production of Antimicrobial Metabolites by Bacillus subtilis Immobilized in Polyacrylamide Gel. Pakistan J. Zool. 2010;42(3):267-275. Режим доступа: https://mafiadoc.com/pro-duction-of-antimicrobial-metabolites-by-bacillus-subtilis-_5b8e2e40097c47f0398b476f.html
10. Sartory R., Sartor-Bergfeld R., Mertens S. A., Guenther J. N., Parrish J. J., Wiltbank M. C. Fertilization and early embryonic development in heifers and lactating cows in summer and lactating and dry cows in winter. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85(11):2803-2812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74367-1
11. Lelyak A. A., Shternshis M. V. Antagonisticheskiy potentsial sibirskikh shtammov Bacillus spp. v otnoshenii vozbuditeley bolezney zhivotnykh i rasteniy. [Antagonistic potential of Siberian strains of Bacillus spp. concerning pathogens of animals and plants]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya = Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2014;(1):42-55. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22888268
12. Dursenev M. S., Filatov A. V. Korrektsiya reproduktivnoy funktsii korov pri ispol'zovanii biodobavki Verva. [Correction of reproductive function of cows when using Verva bioadditive]. Voprosy normativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya v veterinarii. 2017;(1):87-90. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28896930
13. Baruzzi F., Quintieri L., Morea M., Caputo L. Antimicrobial Compounds Produced by Bacillus spp. and Applications in Food. Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances (Vilas A.M., ed.). Badajoz, Spain: Formatex, 2011. P. 1102-1111. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscho-lar.org/7e45/7bdb20f3a5fe3ce0c5bd542748021c4adefb.pdf
14. Dursenev M. S., Filatov A. V. Ispol'zovanie biodobavki «Verva» dlya aktivatsii reproduktivnoy funktsii korov i rosta molochnoy produktivnosti. [The use of "Verva" bioadditive for activation of reproductive function of cows and growth of milk production]. Uchenye zapiski uchrezhdeniya obrazovaniya Vitebskaya ordena Znak pocheta gosudarstvennaya akademiya veterinarnoy meditsiny. 2017:53(2):169-172. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/ item.asp?id=30058552
15. Wang G. Human Antimicrobial Peptides and Proteins. Pharmaceuticals. 2014;7(5):545-594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph7050545
16. Ernst L. K., Samuylenko A. Ya., Egorov I. A., Andrianova E. N., Saleeva I. P. Lizinsinteziruyushchiy preparat Prolizer pri vyrashchivanii broylerov. [Lysin generating Prolizer preparation in broiler production]. Ptitsevodstvo. 2011;(4):35-36. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16527778
17. Sumi C. D, Yang B. W., Yeo I. C., Hahm Y. T. Antimicrobial peptides of the genus Bacillus: a new era for antibiotics. Can. J. Microbiol. 2015;61(2):93-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2014-0613
18. Sapozhnikov A. F., Filatov A. V., Shemuranova N. A. Primenenie probioticheskogo preparata Olin pri vyrashchivanii molodnyaka perepelov myasnogo napravleniya. [ Use of Olin probiotic preparation in raising young quails in table poultry production]. Sovremennye nauchno-prakticheskie dostizheniya v veterinarii: sb. statey Mezhdunar. nauchn.-prakt. konf. [Modern scientific and practical achievements in Veterinary Medicine: Collection of articles of the International scientific and practical Conference]. Kirov, 2018. pp. 82-89.
19. Horosheva T. V., Vodyanoy V., Sorokulova I. Efficacy of Bacillus probiotics in prevention of antibiotic–associated diarrhoea: a randomized, double–blind, placebo–controlled clinical trial. JMM Case Reports. 2014;1(3). 6 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/jmmcr.0.004036
20. Kosilov V. I., Mironova I. V. Effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya energii ratsionov korovami cherno-pestroy porody pri skarmlivanii probioticheskoy dobavki Vetosporin-aktiv. [The efficiency of consuming the energy of the diets by black-motley breed cows when fed with Vetosporin-active probiotic supplement]. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2015;(2 (52)):179-182. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23401180
21. Jeong J. S., Kim I. H. Effect of Bacillus subtilis C–3102 spores as a probiotic feed supplement on growth performance, noxious gas emission, and intestinal microflora in broilers. Poult.Sci. 2014;93(12);3097-3103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04086
22. Kosilov V. I., Mironova I. V. Potreblenie pitatel'nykh veshchestv i balans azota u korov cherno-pestroy porody pri vvedenii v ikh ratsion probioticheskogo preparata Vetosporin-aktiv. [Nutrient consumption and nitrogen balance in cows of black-motley breed by addition of Vetosporin-active probiotic preparation into the diet]. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2015;(3 (53)):122-124. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23828379
23. Hu Y., Dun Y., Li S., Zhao Sh., Peng N., Liang Yu. Effects of Bacillus subtilis KN–42 on Growth Perfor-mance, Diarrhea and Faecal Bacterial Flora of Weaned Piglets. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2014;27(8);1131-1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13737
24. Soldatova V. V., Sobolev D. V., Novikova N. I., Il'ina L. A., Filippova V. A., Gorbacheva E. E., Mov-sisyan A. G. Vliyanie kormovoy dobavki Profort® na mikrofloru rubtsa i produktivnost' doynykh koz. [The effect of Profort® feed additive on the microflora of rumen and productivity of milking goats]. Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo = Journal of Dairy and Beef Cattle Farming. 2018;(5):24-27. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru /item.asp?id=35606279
25. Yang J. J., Niu C. C., Guo X. H. Mixed culture models for predicting intestinal microbial interactions be-tween Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus in the presence of probiotic Bacillus subtilis. Benef. Microbes. 2015;6(6):871-877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2015.0033
26. Laptev G., Novikova N., Selivanov D., Soldatova V., Bol'shakov V. Profort® v kormlenii korov. [Profort® in feeding cows]. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. 2017;(2):46-47. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30006665
27. Zhang Y. R., Xiong H. R., Guo X. H. Enhanced viability of Lactobacillus reuteri for probiotics production in mixed solid–state fermentation in the presence of Bacillus subtilis. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 2014;59(1):31-36. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12223-013-0264-4
28. Stein T. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;56(4):845-857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x
29. Huang Q., Xu X., Mao Y. L., Huang Yi., Rajput I. R., Li W-f. Effects of Bacillus subtilis B10 spores on viability and biological functions of murine macrophages. Animal Science Journal. 2013;84(3):247-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2012.01064.x
30. Awais M., Pervez A., Yaqub Asim, Shah M. M. Production of Antimicrobial Metabolites by Bacillus subtilis Immobilized in Polyacrylamide Gel. Pakistan J. Zool. 2010;42(3):267-275. Режим доступа: https://mafiadoc.com/pro-duction-of-antimicrobial-metabolites-by-bacillus-subtilis-_5b8e2e40097c47f0398b476f.html
31. Jones S. E., Paynich M. L., Kearns D. B., Knight K. L. Protection from intestinal inflammation by bacterial exopolysaccharides. Journal of Immunology. 2014;192(10):4813-4820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1303369
32. Lelyak A. A., Shternshis M. V. Antagonisticheskiy potentsial sibirskikh shtammov Bacillus spp. v otnoshenii vozbuditeley bolezney zhivotnykh i rasteniy. [Antagonistic potential of Siberian strains of Bacillus spp. concerning pathogens of animals and plants]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya = Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2014;(1):42-55. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22888268
33. Sebastian A. P., Keerthi T. R. Immunomodulatory effect of probiotic strain Bacillus subtilis MBTU PBBMI spores in Balb/C Mice. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR). 2014;2(11):258-260. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273139934_immunomodulatory_effect_ of_probiotic_strain_Bacillus_subtilis_MBTU_PBBM1_spores_in_Balbc_Mice
34. Baruzzi F., Quintieri L., Morea M., Caputo L. Antimicrobial Compounds Produced by Bacillus spp. and Applications in Food. Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances (Vilas A.M., ed.). Badajoz, Spain: Formatex, 2011. P. 1102-1111. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscho-lar.org/7e45/7bdb20f3a5fe3ce0c5bd542748021c4adefb.pdf
35. Ulloa Rojas J. B., Verreth J. A., Amato S., Huisman E. A. Biological treatments affect the chemical com-position of coffee pulp. Bioresourtion technology. 2003;89(3):267-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00070-1
36. Wang G. Human Antimicrobial Peptides and Proteins. Pharmaceuticals. 2014;7(5):545-594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph7050545
37. Phromraksa P., Nagano H., Boonmars T., Kamboonruang C. Identification of proteolytic bacteria from thai traditional fermented foods and their allergenic reducing potentials. Journal of food science. 2008;73(4):M189-M195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00721.x
38. Sumi C. D, Yang B. W., Yeo I. C., Hahm Y. T. Antimicrobial peptides of the genus Bacillus: a new era for antibiotics. Can. J. Microbiol. 2015;61(2):93-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2014-0613
39. Liu Y. P., Liu X., Dong L. Lactulose plus live binary Bacillus subtilis in the treatment of elders with functional constipation. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012;92(42):2961-2964. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23328284
40. Horosheva T. V., Vodyanoy V., Sorokulova I. Efficacy of Bacillus probiotics in prevention of antibiotic–associated diarrhoea: a randomized, double–blind, placebo–controlled clinical trial. JMM Case Reports. 2014;1(3). 6 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/jmmcr.0.004036
41. Seliverstov P. V., Chikhacheva E. A., Teterina L. A., Sitkin S. I., Radchenko V. G. Vozmozhnye puti korrektsii disbioza kishechnika i pechenochnoy entsefalopatii u bol'nykh khronicheskimi zabolevaniyami pecheni. [Possible ways of correction of intestinal dysbiosis and hepatic encephalopathy in patients with chronic liver diseases]. Gastroenterologiya Sankt-Peterburga. 2011;(1):6-10. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29730005
42. Jeong J. S., Kim I. H. Effect of Bacillus subtilis C–3102 spores as a probiotic feed supplement on growth performance, noxious gas emission, and intestinal microflora in broilers. Poult.Sci. 2014;93(12);3097-3103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04086
43. Chen Y. J., Min B. J., Cho J. H., Kwon O. S., Son K. S., Kim I. H., Kim S. J. Effects of dietary Enterococcus faecium SF68 on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and faecal noxious gas content in finish-ing pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2006;19(3):406-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.406
44. Hu Y., Dun Y., Li S., Zhao Sh., Peng N., Liang Yu. Effects of Bacillus subtilis KN–42 on Growth Perfor-mance, Diarrhea and Faecal Bacterial Flora of Weaned Piglets. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2014;27(8);1131-1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13737
45. Gromyko E. V. Otsenka sostoyaniya organizma korov metodami biokhimii. [Assessment of the state of the body of cows by methods of biochemistry]. Ekologicheskiy vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza = The North Caucasus Ecological Herald. 2005;(2):80-94. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21237568
46. Yang J. J., Niu C. C., Guo X. H. Mixed culture models for predicting intestinal microbial interactions be-tween Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus in the presence of probiotic Bacillus subtilis. Benef. Microbes. 2015;6(6):871-877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2015.0033
47. Zhang Y. R., Xiong H. R., Guo X. H. Enhanced viability of Lactobacillus reuteri for probiotics production in mixed solid–state fermentation in the presence of Bacillus subtilis. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 2014;59(1):31-36. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12223-013-0264-4
48. Huang Q., Xu X., Mao Y. L., Huang Yi., Rajput I. R., Li W-f. Effects of Bacillus subtilis B10 spores on viability and biological functions of murine macrophages. Animal Science Journal. 2013;84(3):247-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2012.01064.x
49. Jones S. E., Paynich M. L., Kearns D. B., Knight K. L. Protection from intestinal inflammation by bacterial exopolysaccharides. Journal of Immunology. 2014;192(10):4813-4820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1303369
50. Sebastian A. P., Keerthi T. R. Immunomodulatory effect of probiotic strain Bacillus subtilis MBTU PBBMI spores in Balb/C Mice. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR). 2014;2(11):258-260. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273139934_immunomodulatory_effect_ of_probiotic_strain_Bacillus_subtilis_MBTU_PBBM1_spores_in_Balbc_Mice
51. Ulloa Rojas J. B., Verreth J. A., Amato S., Huisman E. A. Biological treatments affect the chemical com-position of coffee pulp. Bioresourtion technology. 2003;89(3):267-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00070-1
52. Phromraksa P., Nagano H., Boonmars T., Kamboonruang C. Identification of proteolytic bacteria from thai traditional fermented foods and their allergenic reducing potentials. Journal of food science. 2008;73(4):M189-M195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00721.x
53. Liu Y. P., Liu X., Dong L. Lactulose plus live binary Bacillus subtilis in the treatment of elders with functional constipation. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012;92(42):2961-2964. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23328284
54. Seliverstov P. V., Chikhacheva E. A., Teterina L. A., Sitkin S. I., Radchenko V. G. Vozmozhnye puti korrektsii disbioza kishechnika i pechenochnoy entsefalopatii u bol'nykh khronicheskimi zabolevaniyami pecheni. [Possible ways of correction of intestinal dysbiosis and hepatic encephalopathy in patients with chronic liver diseases]. Gastroenterologiya Sankt-Peterburga. 2011;(1):6-10. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29730005
55. Chen Y. J., Min B. J., Cho J. H., Kwon O. S., Son K. S., Kim I. H., Kim S. J. Effects of dietary Enterococcus faecium SF68 on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and faecal noxious gas content in finish-ing pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2006;19(3):406-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.406
56. Gromyko E. V. Otsenka sostoyaniya organizma korov metodami biokhimii. [Assessment of the state of the body of cows by methods of biochemistry]. Ekologicheskiy vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza = The North Caucasus Ecological Herald. 2005;(2):80-94. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21237568
Review
For citations:
Filatov A.V., Shemuranova N.A., Sapozhnikov A.F. The efficiency of Profort additive in feeding cows during the period of increasing the milk yield. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2019;20(5):478-487. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2019.20.5.478-487
Views:
840
Email this article 