Territorial features of the land market in rural areas

The qualitative peculiarity of the existing land market in rural areas requires constant assessment of both the mechanisms that control its development and the direction of changes in its segments. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to analyze the territorial features of the development of the agricultural land market in modern conditions of the implementation of the import substitution policy. The research was carried out across the constituent entities of the Russian Federation of the Northwestern Federal District (NWFD) and in more detail on the example of the municipal districts of the Leningrad region using data from Rosstat, Rosreestr, the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation and other sources. Statistical methods of information processing were used. Based on the analysis of the dynamics of changes in the size of the cultivated areas, it was concluded that there were unfavorable tendencies as to the demand for arable land in the conditions of the Northwestern Federal District. Due to it, the reduction in the area under crops occurs in regions with more favorable conditions for agricultural activities. As the result, the growth in the number of transactions for the sale and purchase of agricultural land in the regions of the Northwestern Federal District is not sustainable. On the example of the municipal districts of the Leningrad region, the features of the primary and secondary market for agricultural land were revealed: the supply of land plots exceeds demand and is localized in the suburban area, such types of land turnover as the purchase and sale and lease of land plots have limited development. Depending on the location and other rental characteristics, the level of land prices, even within the boundaries of one municipal district, varies from 2.5 to 15 times. It has been established that the development of subsystems of market turnover of agricultural land is closely related to the conditions and results of economic activity in rural areas.

1. Erma B., Yufeng Z., Mingkai Y, Jiaxing S. Study of The Russian Land Market. Nature of inner Asia. 2018;1(6):77-84. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32748322

2. Volkov S., Komov N., Khlystun V. Kak dostich' effektivnogo upravleniya zemel'nymi resursami v Rossii? [How to achieve effective land management in Russia?]. Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skokhozyaystvennyy zhurnal = International Agricultural Journal. 2015;(3):3-7. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kak-dostich-effektivnogo-upravleniya-zemelnymi-resursami-v-rossii

3. Kostyaev A. I., Nikonova G. N., Trafimov A. G. Zemel'nyy potentsial sel'skikh territoriy: perspektivy razvitiya. [Land capacity of rural territories: prospects of development]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaystva Rossii. 2015;(11):24-30. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24869672

4. Zavorotin E. F. Povyshenie effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya zemel' v chastnoy sobstvennosti. [Improving the efficiency of using land in private property]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaystva Rossii. 2018;(9):33-36. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35606947

5. Chernyaev A. A., Zavorotin E. F. Zemel'nyy vopros: kogda zhe on razreshitsya? [Land problem: when will it be resolved?]. Ekonomika sel'skokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy = Economy of agricultural and processing enterprises. 2014;(11):8-10. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22565304

6. Prodovol'stvennyy rynok regionov Rossii: novyy vektor razvitiya. [Food market of Russian regions: a new vector of development]. Pod obshch. red. Yu. G. Lavrikovoy, V. P. Neganovoy. Ekaterinburg: Ural'skoe otdelenie RAN, 2018. 776 p.

7. Komov N. V. Zemlya Rossii − eto territoriya gosudarstva i samoe glavnoe bogatstvo naroda. [Russian Land is the territory of the state and the most important wealth of people]. Ekonomika i ekologiya territorial'nykh obrazovaniy = Economy and ecology of territorial formations. 2019;3(1):6-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23947/2413-1474-2019-3-1-6-14

8. Petrikov A. V. Zemlepol'zovanie razlichnykh kategoriy khozyaystv po rezul'tatam Vserossiyskoy sel'skokhozyaystvennoy perepisi 2016 goda i sovershenstvovanie zemel'noy politiki. [Land use of various categories of farms by results of the All-russian agricultural census of 2016 and improvement of land policy]. APK: Ekonomika, upravlenie. 2018;(11):23-35. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36587504

9. Bukhtoyarov N. I. Effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya zemel'nykh resursov v regione. [Efficiency of use of land resources in the region]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaystva Rossii. 2019;(1):13-19. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32651/191-13

10. Polterovich V. M. Institutsional'nye lovushki: est' li vykhod? [Institutional traps and ways out]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2004;(3):5-16. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17664394

11. Uzun V. U kogo segodnya zemlya, nikto ne znaet. [No one knows who owns the land today]. Agrarnoe obozrenie. 2012;3(31). (In Russ.) URL: http://agroobzor.ru/downloads/zemlya-3-2012.pdf

12. Lipski S. A. Problemy vovlecheniya zemel'nykh doley v khozyaystvennyy oborot. [The development of mechanism for the removal of unusedagricultural land]. Moskovskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal = Moscow journal. 2017;(4):99. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-046X-2017-10016

13. Nazarenko V. I., Shmelev G. I. Zemel'nye otnosheniya i rynok zemli. [Land relations and land market]. Moscow: Pamyatniki istoricheskoy mysli, 2005. 292 p.

14. Polterovich V. M. Privatizatsiya i ratsional'naya struktura sobstvennosti. Chast' 2. Ratsionalizatsiya struktury sobstvennosti. [Privatization and the rational ownership structure. Part 2. Rationalizing the ownership structure]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2013;1(60):7-24. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18905014

15. Kleyner G. Ustoychivost' rossiyskoy ekonomiki v zerkale sistemnoy ekonomicheskoy teorii. Ch. 2. [Sustainability of Russian economy in the mirror of the system economic theory (part 2)]. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2016;(1):117- 138. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25257709

16. Buga Z. K., Kostyaev A. I., Mitskevich A. A. Otsenka effektivnosti i prioritetov razvitiya APK. [Assessment of the efficiency and development priorities of the agro-industrial complex]. Agrarnaya nauka = Agrarian science. 1993;(4):16-17.

17. Bukhtoyarov N. I. Mekhanizm regulirovaniya zemel'nykh otnosheniy v agrarnoy sfere: tendentsii, napravleniya, effektivnost': monografiya. [The mechanism for regulating land relations in the agricultural sector: trends, directions, efficiency: monograph]. Orel: Orlovskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet imeni N. V. Parakhina, 2019. 227 p.