Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

Interchangeability of hunts as a factor of sustainability of hunting use

https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2023.24.2.286-293

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to develop in hunting management the approaches to identifying, evaluating and accounting the socio-ecological phenomena of hunter specialization (by types of hunting, game caught) and the interchangeability of hunts, taking into account the presence of a market sector in the area under consideration. The research used the methods of interdisciplinary analogies and semi-structured interviews in addition to general scientific methods. A comparison of hunts close in formal characteristics was made, their significant differences were revealed. It is noted that comparisons can be made for many hunts, and their quantitative and qualitative differences will be more significant. The wide distribution and relative stability of hunters' preferences are shown. A definition of the concept of hunt interchangeability has been developed.   The structural elements of this definition determine the algorithm of practical survey, which is necessary at the design stage of changing the protection regime and the use of hunting resources. Recommendations are given on the practical analysis  of the interchangeability of hunts practiced in certain areas, the inclusion of the results in strategic planning documents and the consideration in planning management decisions that provide for the prohibition of separate hunts. It is pointed out that ignoring the phenomenon of hunters' specialization when setting hunting restrictions can lead to a complete or partial loss of this hunt, related knowledge, abilities and skills. Especially dangerous is the loss of highly specialized hunts, including the use of specially bred decoying and catching animals. Other undesirable consequences may be a reduction in the social base of hunting in general, as well as an increasing protested or constrained poaching. The combination of these and other negative phenomena creates a threat to the sustainability of the use of hunting resources.

About the Authors

S. P. Matveytchuk
Professor B.M. Zhitkov Russian Research Institute of Game Management and Fur Farming (VNIIOZ)
Russian Federation

Sergey P. Matveytchuk - senior researcher, the Department of Economics, Engineering, Law and Hunting Tourism, Professor.

Preobrazhenskaya (Engels) street, 79, Kirov, 610000



I. A. Grebnev
Vyatka State University; Vyatka State Agrotechnological University; Institute of Natural Resource and Environmental Law
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Grebnev - PhD in Biological Science, associate professor, associate professor at the Department of Labor and Social Law, Vyatka SU; associate professor at the Department of Hunting and Biology of Wild Animals, Vyatka SAU; Director, Institute of Natural Resource and Environmental Law.

Moskovskaya str., 36, Kirov, 610000; Oktyabrsky Ave., 133, Kirov, 610017; Proletarskaya str., 14. Kirov, 610002



References

1. Matveychuk S. P. Sustainability of use of hunting resources: International developments and the situation in Russia. Ispol'zovanie i okhrana prirodnykh resursov v Rossii. 2008;(3):44-48. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18055363

2. Matveychuk S. P. Sustainability of use of hunting resources: International developments and the situation in Russia (Ending. Beginning in No. 3). Ispol'zovanie i okhrana prirodnykh resursov v Rossii. 2008;(4):33-39. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17932429

3. Debarbieux B., Bortolotto C., Munz H., Raziano C. Sharing heritage? Politics and territoriality in UNESCO’s heritage lists. Territory, Politics, Governance. 2021;9:1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1854112

4. Díaz-Reviriego I., Turnhout E., Beck S. Participation and inclusiveness in the intergovernmental sciencepolicy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Nature Sustainability. 2019;2(6):457-464. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0290-6

5. Lam D. P. M., Hinz E., Lang D. J., Tengö M., von Wehrden H., Martín-López B. Indigenous and local knowledge in sustainability transformations research: a literature review. Ecology and Society. 2020;25(1):3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11305-250103

6. Skvortsov D. A. Dynamics of regulatory prohibitions of tools and methods of hunting (based on the material of the Kirov region). Protection and rational use of animal and plant resources: Proceedings of International scientific and practical Conference. May 29 – June 1, 2008. Irkutsk: IrGSKhA, 2008. pp. 189-193.

7. Brinkmann S. Unstructured and Semistructured Interviewing. In: Leavy P. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2014. pp. 424-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190847388.013.22

8. Hennink M., Hutter I., Bailey A. Qualitative Research Methods. 2nd edition. London, UK: SAGE Publications, 2020. 346 р.

9. Shteynberg I. E. The ‘long table’ method at the field stage of the research. Krest'yanovedenie. 2021;6(3):19-41. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2021-6-3-19-41

10. Ilin V. I. Dramaturgy of qualitative field research: monograph. Saint Petersburg: Intersotsis, 2006. 256 p. URL: http://social-orthodox.info/materials/5_3_ilin_dram%20_kach_pol_issl.pdf

11. Parker C., Scott S., Geddes A. Snowball sampling. SAGE research methods foundations, 2019. 13 p. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831710

12. Peat D. International Investment Law and the Public Law Analogy: The Fallacies of the General Principles Method. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2018;9(4):654-678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idy028

13. Kanina Yu. S. The importance and role of subsidiary application of law in the institute of analogy of law. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2019;(2):60-65. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39173879

14. Zarubin B. E., Kolesnikov V. V., Kozlova A. V., Shevnina M. S., Economov A. V. Species structure of small game hunting in the Kirov region at the beginning of the XXI century. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2021;22(4):597-607. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2021.22.4.597-607

15. Zarubin B. E., Makarov V. A. Spring hunting in the Kirov region (preferences, results, costs). Modern problems of nature management, hunting and animal husbandry: Proceedings of International scientific and practical Conference dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the VNIIOZ named after prof. B. M. Zhitkov (May 22-25, 2012). Pod obshch. red. V. V. Shiryaeva. Kirov: GNU VNIIOZ im. prof. B. M. Zhitkova Rossel'khozakademii, 2012. pp. 264-265. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vesennyaya-ohota-v-kirovskoy-oblasti-predpochteniya-rezultaty-zatraty

16. Zarubin B. E., Makarov V. A., Petrov A. K., Ekonomov A. V., Kozlova A. V. Species structure of the ducks of the Kirov region and its changes over the past 40 years. Vestnik okhotovedeniya = Bulletin of hunting science. 2019;16(4):289-293. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41308782


Review

For citations:


Matveytchuk S.P., Grebnev I.A. Interchangeability of hunts as a factor of sustainability of hunting use. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2023;24(2):286-293. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2023.24.2.286-293

Views: 311


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)