Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

Using Origanum vulgare L. in the floor management of chickens as an element of organic poultry farming

https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.2.251-263

Abstract

The article provides the results of the use of dried Origanum vulgare mass as an additional component of bedding material in chickens of the Hubbard Redbro M meat-and-egg cross. Origanum vulgare dried mass was added at the rate of 0.5 kg per experimental group daily from the age of 45 days after the transfer of chickens to floor management. The number of heads for each group was 35. The live weight advantage at the age of 2 months of the experimental group of chickens over the control group is 102.5 g, at 75 days of age is 216.5 g, at 90 days of age is 326.0 g and at the age of 105 days is 403.0 g. The SBA increased at the background of the S. aureus test culture: there was a significant suppression of colonies in the first five hours of exposure, and at the background of the E. coli test culture there was a suppression throughout the entire study period. The intensification of metabolic processes was noted in chickens of the experimental group, due to increased protein metabolism, liver and kidney enzymes of blood serum, which was also associated with an increased concentration of thyroid hormones. All these factors made it possible to raise significantly the gain in live weight by an average of 0.11 kg, which increased the slaughter weight by 8.4 %. Almost all indicators of the development of internal organs in chickens of group II are within significant limits of the difference compared with the control group.

About the Authors

T. A. Kuevda
Research Institute of Agriculture of Crimea
Russian Federation

Tatyana A. Kuevda, PhD in Biological Science, senior researcher, the Department of Field Crops

150, Kievskaya str, Simferopol, 295043



D. V. Zubochenko
Research Institute of Agriculture of Crimea
Russian Federation

Denis V. Zubochenko, PhD in Biological Science, Deputy Director for Production and Implementation of Innovative Developments

150, Kievskaya str, Simferopol, 295043



P. S. Ostapchuk
Research Institute of Agriculture of Crimea
Russian Federation

Pavel S. Ostapchuk, PhD in Agricultural Science, leading researcher, the Department of Field Crops

150, Kievskaya str, Simferopol, 295043



E. F. Myagkikh
Research Institute of Agriculture of Crimea
Russian Federation

Elena F. Myagkikh, PhD in Biological Science, senior researcher, the Department of Essential Oil and Medicinal Crops

150, Kievskaya str, Simferopol, 295043



M. A. Ahrameeva
Research Institute of Agriculture of Crimea
Russian Federation

Maria A. Ahrameeva, junior researcher, the Laboratory of Processing and Standardization of Essential Oil Raw Materials

150, Kievskaya str, Simferopol, 295043



L. N. Reinstein
Research Institute of Agriculture of Crimea
Russian Federation

Lyudmila N. Reinstein, junior researcher, the Department of Field Crops

150, Kievskaya str, Simferopol, 295043



T. P. Sataieva
V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Tatiana P. Sataieva, DSc of Medical Science, professor, Head of the Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, Institute «Medical Academy named after S. I. Georgievsky»

Lenin Boulevard, 5/7, Simferopol, 295051



O. N. Postnikova
V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Olga N. Postnikova, senior lecturer, the Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, Institute «Medical Academy named after S. I. Georgievsky»

Lenin Boulevard, 5/7, Simferopol, 295051



L. A. Shevkoplyas
V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Ludmila A. Shevkoplyas, assistant, the Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, Institute «Medical Academy named after S. I. Georgievsky»

Lenin Boulevard, 5/7, Simferopol, 295051



References

1. Fisinin V. I. Dynamics of development of the markets of poultry meat and eggs in Russian Federation and the results of the branch activity in 2022. Ptitsevodstvo. 2023;(4):4–8. (In Russ.).

2. Terletskiy V. P., Tyshchenko V. I. Specific features of the genomic dna structure in gene pool chicken populations as revealed by multilocus DNA probe. Ptitsevodstvo. 2023;(2):14–18. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33845/0033-3239-2023-72-2-14-18

3. Grygorieva M. A., Velichko O. A., Zhigileva O. N., Pak I. V., Vinogradsky I. A., Rustamov R. D., Trofimov O. V. ISSR polymorphism of laying hens of broiler parental stock distinguished by rates of growth and productivity indicators. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2020;21(4):453–461. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.4.453-461

4. Fedorova E. S., Stanishevskaya O. I., Dementieva N. V. Current state and problems of poultry breeding in Russia (review). Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2020;21(3):217–232. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.3.217-232

5. Sulimova L. I., Zhuchaev K. V., Kochneva M. L. Poultry behavior reactions and welfare (review). Sel'skokhozyaystvennaya biologiya = Agricultural Biology. 2020;55(2):209–224. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2020.2.209rus

6. El-Deek A., El-Sabrout К. Behaviour and meat quality of chicken under different housing systems. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2019;75(1):105–114. URL: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000946

7. Mottet A., Tempio G. Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2017;73(2):245–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000071

8. Buyarov V. S., Royter Ya. S., Kavtarashvili A. Sh., Chervonova I. V., Buyarov A. V., Royter L. M. Methodology of comprehensive assessment of breeding and productive qualities of poultry: monograph. Orel: Orlovskiy GAU im. N. V. Parakhina, 2020. 201 p.

9. Oloyo A. The Use of Housing System in the Management of Heat Stress in Poultry Production in Hot and Humid Climate: a Review. Poultry Science Journal. 2018;6(1):1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22069/psj.2018.13880.1284

10. Wang L., Zhang Y., Kong L., Wang Z. Effects of rearing system (floor vs. cage) and sex on performance, meat quality and enteric microorganism of yellow feather broilers. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2021;20(7):1907–1920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63420-7

11. Bessei W. Impact of animal welfare on worldwide poultry production World's Poultry Science Journal. 2018;74(2):211–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000028

12. Elson' H. A. Poultry welfare in intensive and extensive production systems. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2015;71(3):449–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933915002172

13. Martinez-Perez M., Sarmiento-Franco L., Santos-Ricalde R. H., Sandoval-Castro C. A. Poultry meat production in free-range systems: perspectives for tropical areas World's Poultry Science Journal. 2017;73(2):309–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000034

14. Garcia R. G., Almeida Paz I. C. L., Caldara F. R., Nӓӓs I. A., Pereira D. F., Ferreira V. M. O. S. Selecting the Most Adequate Bedding Material for Broiler Production in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 2012;14(2):71–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2012000200006

15. Fisinin V. I., Egorov I. A., Tsyganov A. R., Tomson A. E., Ponomarenko Yu. A., Fesina V. V., Lizun R. P., Martynenko A. A. Sorbent testing in poultry bedding. Ptitsa i ptitseprodukty = Poultry and Poultry Products. 2014;(3):28–30. (In Russ.).

16. Munir M. T., Belloncle C., Irle M., Federighi M. Wood-based litter in poultry production: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2019;75(1):5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000909

17. Al-Homidan I. M., Fathi M., Al-Shumaymiri A. Chopped palm leaves as an acceptable bedding material for broiler production. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2018;27(1):59–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfx040

18. Teixeira A. S., de Oliveira M. C., Menezes J. F. S., Gouvea B. M., Teixeira S. R., Gomes A. R. Poultry litter of wood shavings and sugarcane bagasse animal performance and bed quality. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2015;28(3):238–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v28n3a4

19. Atencio J. L., Fernandes J. A., Gernat A. G., Murillo J. G. Effect of pine wood shavings, rice hulls and river bed sand on broiler productivity when used as a litter source. International Journal of Poultry science. 2010;9(3):240–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.240.243

20. Temmoev M. I., Kulintsev V. V., Ulimbashev M. B. Litter for chickens on the base of zeolite "alanit" clay. Zhivotnovodstvo i kormoproizvodstvo = Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2018;101(3):172–177. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36293478

21. Epimakhova E. E., Samokish N. V., Barsukova M. G. The relationship between the quality of bedding materials and the viability of broilers in the pre-start period. Topical issues of pathology, morphology and therapy of animals: materials of the 19th International Scientific Method. conf. on pathological anatomy of animals. Stavropol': izd-vo «Agrus», 2018. pp. 157–160.

22. Epimahova E. E., Samokish N. B., Barsukova M. G. Effect bio-destructor of litter on broiler productivity. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2018;9(6):1774–1778. URL: https://www.rjpbcs.com/pdf/2018_9(6)/[286].pdf

23. El-Ashram S., Abdelhafez G. A. Effects of phytogenic supplementation on productive performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2020;29(4):852–862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2020.07.005

24. Kamboh A. A., Leghari R. A., Khan M. A., Kaka U., Naseer M., Sazili A. Q., Malhi K. K. Flavonoids supplementation – An ideal approach to improve quality of poultry products. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2019;75(1):115–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000703

25. Ognik K., Cholewinska E. I., Sembratowicz I., Grela E., Czech A. The potential of using plant antioxidants to stimulate antioxidant mechanisms in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2016;72(2):291–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933915002779

26. Shatskikh E. V., Loretts O.  G., Korol'kova-Subbotkina D. E., Drozdova L. I., Galiev D. M., Kravtsova L. Z., Polyakov P. S. Development of biotechnological approaches to increase the resistance of broiler chickens when using safe growth stimulants in the diet: scientific and practical recommendations. Ekaterinburg: izd-vo Ural'skogo GAU, 2020. 68 p. URL: http://repository.urgau.ru/images/NPR/Razrab_biot_podhodov_NPR_2020.pdf

27. Alagawany M., Elnesr S. S., Farag M. R. Use of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) in poultry nutrition: Global impacts on performance, carcass and meat quality. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2019;75(2):293–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933919000059

28. Greene E. S., Emami N. K., Dridi S. Research Note: Phytobiotics modulate the expression profile of circulating inflammasome and cyto (chemo) kine in whole blood of broilers exposed to cyclic heat stress. Poultry Science. 2021;100(3):100801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.055

29. Ostapchuk P. S., Zubochenko D. V., Kuevda T. A. The role of antioxidants and their use in animal breeding and poultry farming (review). Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2019;20(2):103–117. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2019.20.2.103-117

30. Pashtetsky V., Ostapchuk P., Kuevda T., Zubochenko D., Yemelianov S., Uppe V. Use of phytobiotics in animal husbandry and poultry. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020;215:1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021502002

31. Mednova V. V., Saranyuk S. V. Modern methods of conducting research on egg and poultry production technology. Nauchnyy zhurnal molodykh uchenykh. 2020;(2(19)):47–55. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43033091

32. Shatskikh E. V., Latypova E. N. Blood parameters and productivity of chickens when using phytobiotic preparations in the diet. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala = Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2023;(8(237)):78‒88. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2023-237-08-78-88

33. Gorelik L. Sh., Gorelik O. V., Kharlap S. Yu., Derkho M. A. The pituitary-thyroid status of laying hens cross-country «Lomann-white». Agrarnyy vestnik Urala = Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2018;7(174):11–14. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36587093

34. Troshina E. A. Current aspects of prevention and treatment of iodine deficiency disorders. Focus on risk groups. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2016;(3):82–85. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2016-3-82-85

35. Hansen P. S., Brix T. H., Iachine I., Sørensen T. I. A., Kyvik K. O., Hegedüs L. Genetic and environmental interrelations between measurements of thyroid function in a healthy Danish twin population. American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007;292(3):765–770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00321.2006

36. Cabello G., Wrutniak C. Thyroid hormone and growth: relationships with growth hormone effects and regulation. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 1989;29(4):387–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19890401

37. Bustamam M. S. A., Pantami H. A., Shaari K., Min C. C., Mediani A., Ismail I. S. Immunomodulatory effects of Isochrysis galbana incorporated diet on Oreochromis sp. (red hybrid tilapia) via Sera-1H NMR metabolomics study. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2023;132(S1):108455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2022.108455


Review

For citations:


Kuevda T.A., Zubochenko D.V., Ostapchuk P.S., Myagkikh E.F., Ahrameeva M.A., Reinstein L.N., Sataieva T.P., Postnikova O.N., Shevkoplyas L.A. Using Origanum vulgare L. in the floor management of chickens as an element of organic poultry farming. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2024;25(2):251-263. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.2.251-263

Views: 286


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)