The effectiveness of using the laboratory samples based on bacteria of the genus Streptomyces on peas in the conditions of the Volga-Vyatka region
https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.4.634-644
Abstract
Data on productivity, fungal diseases and the quality of seed peas grown on sod-podzolic medium-clay soil in 2021–2023 using pre-sowing seed treatment separately and in combination with plant vegetation treatment with experimental preparations based on local strains of the genus Streptomyces (A4 and 8A1-3) are presented. The comparison drugs were the chemical fungicide Pioneer, KS and the biological drug Pseudobacterin-2, J. The assessment of the biological effectiveness (BE) of the drugs was carried out on cultivars of peas of various morphotypes bred by the FARC North-East: ‘Falensky yubileiny’, ‘Falensky usaty’, ‘Falensky kormovoy’. The biological effectiveness of all tested preparations in protecting peas from root rot and ascochitosis was determined by the weather conditions of the year of research. In 2021, a significant decrease in the development of root rot compared with the control (38.4 %) was facilitated by seed treatment with a preparation based on S. antimycoticus 8A1-3 strain (29.0 %). A significant reduction in the development of pea root rot in 2022 was achieved by seed treatment with the chemical fungicide Pioneer (by 9.1 %), the reference bio-drug Pseudobacterin-2 (by 9.9 %) and the test strain S. antimycoticus 8Al-3 (by 7.1 %). In protecting peas from ascochitosis in 2022, the strain Streptomyces A4 (BE 72.7 %) proved itself as a Pioneer chemical fungicide (BE 72.7 %), and the strain Streptomyces 8A1-3 (BE 84.1 %) significantly surpassed them in effectiveness. The effect of drugs on the yield of peas in the years of research (HTC = 0.77–0.83 with an average long-term HTC = 1.4) was estimated as insignificant. Treatment with both experimental and commercial preparations of seeds and vegetative plants did not adversely affect the grain size and the content of crude protein in it. The ‘Falensky usaty’ was distinguished among the studied cultivars by large seeds: the mass of 1000 grains was 258.8±18.5 g. The ‘Falensky kormovoy’ and the ‘Falensky jubileiny’ cultivars proved to be medium-seeded ones (174.7±23.1 and 147.9±37.1 g, respectively). The content of crude protein in grain was negatively affected by the development of root rot on peas (correlation coefficient r =-0.77). The maximum crude protein content was recorded during the joint treatment of seeds and plants with a preparation based on S. castalarensis A4 (24.0±2.6 %) in the ‘Falensky jubileiny’ cultivar, with Pseudobacterin-2 (23.1±2.0 %) in the ‘Falensky kormovoy’ cultivar, with a preparation based on S. antimycoticus 8A1-3 (21.1±1.7 %) in the ‘Falensky usaty’ cultivar.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. V. LyskovaRussian Federation
Irina V. Lyskova, PhD in Agricultural Science, senior researcher, the Laboratory of Agrochemistry and Quality
Timiryazev str., 3, s. Falenki, Kirov region, 612500
I. G. Shirokikh
Russian Federation
Irina G. Shirokikh, DSc in Biological Science, professor, chief researcher, the Laboratory of Biotechnology of Plants and Microorganisms
Lenin str., 166a, Kirov, 610007
Ya. I. Nazarova
Russian Federation
Yanina I. Nazarova, PhD in Biological Science, researcher, the Laboratory of Biotechnology of Plants and Microorganisms
Lenin str., 166a, Kirov, 610007
T. V. Lyskova
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Lyskova, analyst engineer, the Laboratory of Agrochemistry and Quality
Timiryazev str., 3, s. Falenki, Kirov region, 612500
S. S. Pislegina
Russian Federation
Svetlana S. Pislegina, researcher, the Laboratory of Breeding and Primary Seed Production of Leguminous Plants
Timiryazev str., 3, s. Falenki, Kirov region, 612500
G. A. Perevozshtikova
Russian Federation
Galina A. Perevozshtikova, research assistant, the Laboratory of Plant Immunity
Timiryazev str., 3, s. Falenki, Kirov region, 612500
References
1. Zotikov V. I., Vilyunov S. D. Present-day breeding of legumes and groat crops in Russia. Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2021;(25(4)):381–387. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46249160
2. Gradoboeva T. P. Root rots of peas in the conditions of the Kirov region. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury = Legumes and Groat Crops. 2019;(3(31)):51–58. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2309-348X-2019-11114
3. Likhacheva L. I., Gimaletdinova V. S., Kozionova E. G. Results of pea breeding at "Ural scientific and research institute of agriculture". Permskiy agrarnyy vestnik = Perm Agrarian Journal. 2017;(4(20)):87–91. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30767228
4. Davletov F. A. Methods and results of pea breeding in Bashkortostan. Ufa: Epokha, 2006. 92 p.
5. Mikhaylikova V. V., Strebkova N. S. Dynamics of pesticide use in the Russian Federation. Agrokhimiya. 2023;(9):37–41. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188123090089
6. Dolzhenko V. I., Laptiev A. B. Modern range of plant protection means: biological efficiency and safety. Plodorodie. 2021;(3):71–75. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25680/S19948603.2021.120.13
7. Korshunova T. Yu., Bakaeva M. D., Kuzina E. V., Rafikova G. F., Chetverikov S. P., Chetverikova D. V., Loginov O. N. Role of bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas in the sustainable development of agricultural systems and environmental protection (review). Prikladnaya biokhimiya i mikrobiologiya. 2021;57(3):211–227. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45070036
8. Ivanova I. Yu., Dementiev D. A. Influence of microbiological preparations on yield of spring soft wheat. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekologiya = Theoretical and Applied Ecology. 2021;(2):128–133. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25750/1995-4301-2021-2-128-133
9. Rai R. V., Bai J. A. Natural Products from Actinomycetes: Diversity, Ecology and Drug Discovery. Mysore, Karnataka, India, 2022. 512 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6132-7
10. Rateb M. E., Ebel R., Jaspars M. Natural product diversity of actinobacteria in the Atacama Desert. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2018;111:1467–1477. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10482-018-1030-z
11. Quinn G. A., Banat A. M., Abdelhameed A. M., Banat I. M. Streptomyces from traditional medicine: Sources of new innovations in antibiotic discovery. Journal of medical microbiology. 2020;69(8):1040–1048. URL: https://core.ac.uk/reader/359945540
12. Caffrey P., Hogan M., Song Y. New glycosylated polyene macrolides: refining the ore from genome mining. Antibiotics. 2022;11(3):334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030334
13. Seipke R. F., Kaltenpoth M., Hutchings M. I. Streptomyces as symbionts: an emerging and widespread theme? FEMS microbiology reviews. 2012;36(4):862–876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00313.x
14. Shirokikh I. G., Alalykin A. A., Nazarova Ya. I. Study of actinobacteria metabolites for the development of biofungicides. Uspekhi meditsinskoy mikologii. 2022;(23):233–237. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49533157
15. Pryanishnikov D. N. About fertilizing the field in crop rotations. Selected articles. Moscow: Kolos, 1962. 185 p.
16. Smirnova-Ikonnikova M. I. Biochemical features of subspecies and varieties. Cultural flora of Russia. Leningrad: Kolos, 1979. Vol. 4., Part. 1. pp. 174–188.
17. Pislegina S. S., Gradoboeva T. P., Lyskova I. V. Protein content in pea grain in the conditions of the VolgaVyatka region. Methods and technologies in plant breeding and crop production. Kirov: NIISKh Severo-Vostoka, 2016. pp. 114–118. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49534579
Review
For citations:
Lyskova I.V., Shirokikh I.G., Nazarova Ya.I., Lyskova T.V., Pislegina S.S., Perevozshtikova G.A. The effectiveness of using the laboratory samples based on bacteria of the genus Streptomyces on peas in the conditions of the Volga-Vyatka region. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2024;25(4):634–644. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.4.634-644