Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

The influence of cultivation technologies on the contamination of spring wheat crops and yield in the conditions of the Nizhny Novgorod region

https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.4.655-663

Abstract

The article presents the results of research of the influence of various cultivation technologies on the contamination of spring wheat crops and its yield for 2022–2023 in the conditions of the Nizhny Novgorod region on light gray loamy forest soil. There were studied the technologies various in methods of primary soil tillage (traditional, minimal – Mini-till, without tillage – No-till), and intensification level (basic, intensive). Spring wheat of the ʻZlataʼ cultivar was cultivated in the chain of rotation: clean fallow – peas - spring wheat. During the research period, it was established that the No-till technology contributed to an increase in the total contamination of spring wheat crops on an average for two years in the "tillering" phase (before herbicide treatment) to 36.2 pcs/m2 (84.7 % higher than the total contamination of wheat crops when cultivated using Mini-till technology and by 118.1 % –using traditional technology) and in the phase of "full grain ripeness" (before harvesting) up to 30.1 pcs/m2 (110.5 % higher than the total contamination of wheat crops cultivated using Mini-till technology and by 155.1 % according to traditional technology). It has been established that intensification of wheat production (application of mineral fertilizers in a dose of N70P50K50 before pre-sowing cultivation; using fungicide and herbicide in the "tillering" phase) results on average among studied technologies in decreasing the total contamination of crops during the "full grain ripeness" phase on average for two years up to15.7 pcs/m2 which is 38.2 % lower compared to the basic intensification degree of wheat cultivation technologies. It was found that the cultivation of spring wheat using traditional technology and Mini-till technology provides high yields: 3.09–3.43 t/ha, that is 0.63–0.96 t/ha higher than its yield when cultivated using No-till technology. There were no differences in the level of yield of spring wheat over the years of observation when cultivating it using traditional and Mini-till technologies. The intensification of spring wheat production makes it possible to increase the level of its yield for each of the studied technologies.

About the Authors

A. V. Ivenin
Nizhny Novgorod State Agrotechnological University
Russian Federation

Alexey V. Ivenin, DSc in Agricultural Science, associate professor, leading researcher, professor at the Department of Agriculture and Crop Production

97, Gagarina Ave., Nizhny Novgorod, 603107



V. V. Ivenin
Nizhny Novgorod State Agrotechnological University
Russian Federation

Valentin V. Ivenin, DSc in Agricultural Science, professor, Head of the Department of Agriculture and Crop Production

97, Gagarina Ave., Nizhny Novgorod, 603107



Yu. A. Bogomolova
Nizhny Novgorod State Agrotechnological University
Russian Federation

Yulia A. Bogomolova, PhD in Agricultural Science, associate professor, senior researcher

97, Gagarina Ave., Nizhny Novgorod, 603107



S. M. Golubev
Nizhny Novgorod State Agrotechnological University
Russian Federation

Sergey M. Golubev, postgraduate student, the Department of Agriculture and Crop Production

97, Gagarina Ave., Nizhny Novgorod, 603107



I. I. Bugrov
Nizhny Novgorod State Agrotechnological University
Russian Federation

Ivan I. Bugrov, master, the Department of Agriculture and Crop Production

97, Gagarina Ave., Nizhny Novgorod, 603107



References

1. Cherkasov G. N., Pykhtin I. G., Gostev A. V. Modern approach to tillage systematization in agricultural technologies of new generation. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AICis. 2016;1(30):5–8. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25651218

2. Dey S. Canada's experience: features of direct seeding. Resursosberegayushchee zemledelie. 2012;2(14):7–12. (In Russ.). URL: https://rucont.ru/efd/225159

3. Dvurechenskiy V. I. Zero technologies: improving the efficiency of grain production and soil fertility. Agro XXI. 2007;(1-3):19–22. (In Russ.). URL: https://betaren.ru/news/nulevye-tehnologii-povyshenie-effektivnosti-proizvodstvazerna-i-pochvennogo-plodorodiya/

4. Kozlova L. M., Popov F. A., Noskova E. N., Denisova A. V. The application of the main elements of resourcesaving environmentally friendly technologies in the cultivation of spring grain crops in the central zone of the North-East of the European part of Russia. Problems of intensification of animal husbandry, taking into account environmental protection and the production of alternative energy sources, including biogas: collection of articles. Varshava: Institut tekhnologicheskikh i estestvennykh nauk v Falentakh, 2018. pp. 67–74.

5. Dridiger V. K., Stukalov R. S., Gadzhiumarov R. G., Vaytsekhovskaya S. S. Influence of crop rotation on the efficiency of arable land use at the cultivation of field crops without soil tillage. Zemledelie. 2019;(6):28–32. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/0044-3913-2019-10607

6. Kozlova L. M., Popov F. A., Noskova E. N., Ivanov V. L. Improved resource-saving technology of soil cultivation and use of bio-preparations for spring cereals crops under conditions of central zone of North-East of european part of Russia. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2017;(3(58)):43–48. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.agronauka-sv.ru/jour/article/view/130/130

7. Shapovalova N. N., Menkina E. A. Agrochemical state and biological activity of soil conditioned by the effect of long-term application of mineral fertilizers. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2018;(5(73)):43–46. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25930/vaak-2r91

8. Karabutov A. P., Solovichenko V. D., Nikitin V. V., Navolneva E. V. Reproduction of soil fertility, productivity and energy efficiency of crop rotations. Zemledelie. 2019;(2):3–7. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/0044-3913-2019-10201

9. Ivenin A. V., Ivenin V. V., Shubina K. V., Sakov A. P. The influence of the technology of cultivation of fallow lands on the yield and energy efficiency of growing grain crops in the conditions of the south-east of the Volga-Vyatka region. Agrarnaya nauka = Agrarian science. 2022;1(7-8):121–125. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2022-361-7-8-212-125

10. Vejan P., Abdullah R., Khadiran T., Ismail S., Boyce A. N. Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Agricultural Sustainability – A Review. Molecules. 2016;21(5):573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050573

11. Antonov V. G., Ermolaev A. P. The efficiency of continuous application of minimum soil tillage methods in crop rotations. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka = Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2018;(4(65)):87-92. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2018.65.4.87-92

12. Borin A. A., Korovina O. A., Loshchinina A. E. Soil treatment in crop rotation. Zemledelie. 2013;(2):20–22. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18849344


Review

For citations:


Ivenin A.V., Ivenin V.V., Bogomolova Yu.A., Golubev S.M., Bugrov I.I. The influence of cultivation technologies on the contamination of spring wheat crops and yield in the conditions of the Nizhny Novgorod region. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2024;25(4):655–663. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2024.25.4.655-663

Views: 209


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)