Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

The study of spring wheat hybrids on yield and protein content

Abstract

Spring wheat F2-F4 hybrids and their original forms were studied on yield and protein content in grain. The productivity of varieties and hybrids were highly varied depending on the environmental conditions and cross combinations (average yield is 217 g/m2, coefficient of variation 39%). The high heterogeneity of F2-F3 populations, strong modification variability and low repeatability of the trait in the offspring does not allow to judge the productive value of hybrid combinations in the first stages of selection with a sufficient degree of reliability. At crossing of varieties with contrast productivity hybrids of the second and third generations have turned to the best parent. The most high-yield samples Ferrugineum 69-96 х Pamyati Ryuba (266 g/m2), Anyuta х Stepnaya 1 (237 g/m2), Anyuta х Izida (239 g/m2) were characterized by a higher degree of variability of the trait (CV = 40...57%). Differences of genotypes on protein content in grain are well expressed. Hybrids had, as a rule, an intermediate position between the original forms. The best combination obtained in crosses of high quality varieties: Ferrugineum 69-96 х Anyuta (12.8...14.1%), Hja 23361 х Anyuta (13.3...14.0%), Botanicheskaya 3 x Gutler (12.5...15.1%), Anyuta x Engelina (12.6...15.3%). Promising hybrid combinations can be evaluated as early as F2 since the protein content is characterized by a high heritability. A high negative correlation between productivity and protein content makes it difficult to obtain initial material which combines these features at a high level. Promising hybrid combinations with optimal display of traits are selected for further breeding work: Botanicheskaya 3 x Kinel'skaya Otrada, Botanicheskaya 3 x Pamyati Ryuba, Anyuta x Engelina , Anyuta x Izida.

About the Author

L. B. Volkova
North-East Agricultural Research Institute
Russian Federation


References

1. Результаты сортоиспытания сельскохозяйственных культур на Госсортоучастках Кировской области за 2011-2013 годы и сортовое районирование на 2014 год. Киров, 2013. 113 с.

2. Мелешкина Е.П. Современные аспекты качества зерна пшеницы // Аграрный вестник Юго-Востока. 2009. №3. С. 4-7.

3. Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта. М.: Колос, 1979. 415 с.

4. Бебякин В.М. Экологические и генетические аспекты качества зерна пшеницы // Здоровье - питание - биологические ресурсы. Киров, 2002. Т.1. С. 224-231.

5. Казарцева А.Т., Шеуджен А.Х., Нещадим Н.Н. Эколого-генетические и агрохимические основы повышения качества зерна. Майкоп, 2004. 159 с.

6. Бебякин В.М., Осыка И.А. Качественная характеристика зерна сортов яровой мягкой пшеницы по потомству // Сельскохозяйственная биология. 2008. №5. С. 33-37.

7. Воробьева Р.А. Наследование содержания протеина в гибридах второго и третьего поколений озимой пшеницы: Сб. науч.тр. Краснодар. НИИСХ, 1975. Вып. 9. С. 154-163.

8. Завалин А.А., Пасынков А.В., Пасынкова Е.Н. Влияние условий азотного питания на урожайность и качество зерна различных сортов яровой пшеницы //Агрохимия. 2000. №7. С. 27-34.

9. Долгодворова Л.И. Селекция полевых культур на качество. М.: Изд-во МСХА, 1995. 178 с.

10. Молчан И.М., Ильина Л.Г, Кубарев П.И. Спорные вопросы в селекции растений // Селекция и семеноводство. 1996. № 1-2. С. 36-51.


Review

For citations:


Volkova L.B. The study of spring wheat hybrids on yield and protein content. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2016;(2):4-8. (In Russ.)

Views: 455


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)