Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

The adaptive potential of hard winter wheat varieties

Abstract

The article describes the parameters of ecological plasticity and stability of characteristic "productivity" in hard winter wheat. Under conditions of the Rostov region hard winter wheat varieties breeding All-Russian Research Institute of Grain Crops: Donskoy Yantar’, Aksinit, Kurant, Agat donskoy, Amazonka, Lazurit, Kristella, Kiprida, Oniks were studied with green manure fallow predecessor in 2010...2015. Variety Donchanka was used as standard. The studies revealed that the average yield in the trials ranged from 5.9 t/ha at variety Donchanka up to 7.2 t/ha at variety Lazurit. The maximum yield for the period of studies was observed at Aksinit (9.8 t/ha). The most stable variety is Kurant which has a low coefficient of variation (CV = 7.8%), and regression coefficient (bi = -1.4). A Kristella had the highest coefficient of variation among the studied varieties (CV = 23.9%). We define a linear regression coefficient (bi) which is less than 1. These genotypes form stable yields under adverse growing conditions. By the method of two-way analysis of variance on parameter "productivity" it was found that the dispersion of "genotype -environment" significantly exceeds the variance of error. Ffactual > Ftheoretical at the sources of variation "variety", "conditions" and "variety-condition". This suggests that varieties respond differently to changes in climatic conditions. In our experiment variety Donchanka was the least responsive; most responsive - variety Lazurit. Varieties Lazurit and Kurant are recommended to growing on the extensive background. Here the highest return could be obtained at the lowest cost.

About the Authors

O. A. Dubinina
All-Russian Research Institute of Grain Crops
Russian Federation


N. N. Vozhzhova
All-Russian Research Institute of Grain Crops
Russian Federation


References

1. Вожжова Н.Н., Кравченко Н.С. Экологическая пластичность сортов озимой мягкой пшеницы по показателю «общая хлебопекарная оценка» // Зерновое хозяйство России. 2014. № 1 (31). С. 22.

2. Самофалова Н.Е., Дубинина О.А., Иличкина Н.П., Васюшкина Н.Е. Урожайность и качество современных сортов твердой озимой пшеницы селекции ГНУ ВНИИЗК им. И.Г. Ка-линенко // Зерновое хозяйство России. 2013. № 1 (25). С. 51.

3. Головченко А.П., Головченко Н.П. Отзывчивость сортов яровой мягкой пшеницы на факторы внешней среды по качеству зерна: Материалы Междун. научно-практ. конферен. Самара, 2005. С. 26-24.

4. Агафонов Е.В., Полуэктов Е.В. Почвы и удобрения Ростовской области: Учебное пособие. 2-е изд. Персиановка: ДонГАУ, 1999. 90 с.

5. Методика государственного сортоиспытания сельскохозяйственных культур: Зерновые, крупяные, зернобобовые, кукуруза и кормовые культуры. Госагропром. Вып. 2. М., 1989. 194 с.

6. Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта. М.: Агропромиздат, 1985. 350 с.

7. Пакудин В.З., Лопатина Л.М. Методы оценки экологической пластичности сортов сельскохозяйственных растений. М., 1971. С. 113-121.

8. Бебякин В.М., Кедрова Л.И., Кериватова Т.Б. Адаптивность: методические подходы, методы и критерии их оценки // Аграрная наука Евро-Северо-Востока. 2005. № 7. С. 4-9.


Review

For citations:


Dubinina O.A., Vozhzhova N.N. The adaptive potential of hard winter wheat varieties. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2016;(2):29-33. (In Russ.)

Views: 555


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)