Transformation of the institution of state regulation and ensuring the sustainability of hunting nature management
https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2026.27.1.208-218
Abstract
This article presents the results of a study examining the characteristics and dynamics of the institutional environment for hunting management under the influence of state regulation from 1995 to the present. Key elements of the institutional environment for this area of activity were identified and analyzed. The stages of state regulation of hunting and game management in the post-Soviet period are identified, and their key parameters are defined. It is shown that, during the first stage, some fundamentally progressive institutions were implemented into legislation, but due to a number of objective and subjective factors, they were significantly reduced in the second stage. It is noted that this transformation resulted in the emergence and exacerbation of a range of industry-specific problems. In particular, despite government measures, the population of the most important species of wild ungulates remains six times lower than the ecological carrying capacity of their habitats. Other pressing and unresolved issues include poaching, the ineffectiveness of regulatory instruments for the removal of invasive species, the mass mortality of game animals from agrochemicals, and the lack of protection for hunting users' rights. Conclusions are drawn regarding the impossibility of ensuring the sustainability of hunting management under the current model of state regulation and the advisability of changing the trajectory of the industry's development. The need for a transition to a new stage of public administration based on the principles of decentralization and subsidiarity of state powers, self-regulation, competition, transparency, and broad public and professional participation is substantiated. This should also involve a significant change in the role and importance of state bodies governing hunting and the conservation of hunting resources.
About the Author
I. A. Grebnev
Vyatka State University;
Vyatka State Agrotechnological University;
Institute of Natural Resource and Environmental Law
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Grebnev, PhD in Biology, associate professor, associate professor at the Department of Labor and Social Law; associate professor at the Department of Hunting and Biology of Wild Animals; director
Moskovskaya str., 36, Kirov, 610000;
Oktyabrsky Ave., 133, Kirov, 610017;
Proletarskaya str., 14. Kirov, 610002
References
1. Danilkin А. А. Analysis of the implementation of “the strategy for the development of hunting husbandry in the russian federation until 2030”: resource aspect. Vestnik okhotovedeniya = Bulletin of hunting science. 2025;22(1):33–40. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=80577804
2. Andreev M. N., Kraev N. V., Kraeva V. N. Federal state policy in the sphere of hunting and hunting sector. Ekologicheskoe parvo = Environmental Law. 2013;(3):27–33. (In Russ.).
3. Grebnev I. A. Problems of state regulation of the organization of hunting protection zones. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekologiya = Theoretical and Applied Ecology. 2019;(1):122–128. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25750/1995-4301-2019-1-122-128
4. Danilkin A. A. State policy and management in the field of hunting: is the right course chosen? Vestnik okhotovedeniya = Bulletin of hunting science. 2015;12(1):104–117. (In Russ.).
5. North D. Institutions, institutional changes, and the functioning of the economy. Moscow: Nachala, 1997. 190 р.
6. Borovskaya L. V. Institutional environment and peculiarities of its formation as a result of institutional changes. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravleniyе = Eurasian Journal of Economics and Management. 2018;(4):5–12. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37035267&ysclid=m8k6zuh08f339710606
7. Shtrazburg S. V. The institutional environment of human capital formation. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Vestnik of the Kazan State Agrarian University. 2009;4(2):105–107. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12899010
8. North D. Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. THESIS. 1993;1(2):69–91. URL: https://studfile.net/preview/16813106/page:3/
9. Fukuyama F. State building: Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century. Moscow: AST, 2006. 220 с.
10. Hodgson G. Economic Theory and Institutions: A Manifesto of Modern Institutional Economic Theory. Moscow: Delo, 2003. 464 р.
11. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Moscow: AST, 2015. 575 р.
12. Popov E. V., Vlasov M. V., Veretennikova A. Yu. On the economic institutions. Vestnik UrFU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2011;(6):4–21. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17104465
13. Matveytchuk S. P. On the structure, composition, and significance of hunting grounds placement schemes. Modern problems of nature management, hunting and animal husbandry: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kirov: FGBNU VNIIOZ im. prof. B. M. Zhitkova, 2012. pp. 52–53. URL: https://elibrary.ru/hpwoki
14. Andreev M. N., Kraev N. V., Kraeva V. N. Regional and state policy in the sphere of hunting and hunting farm. Ekologicheskoe pravo = Environmental Law. 2013;(4):17–23. (In Russ.).
15. Evans M., Zimmermann A. The Global Relevance of Subsidiarity: An Overview. Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2014. pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8810-6_1
16. Matveychuk S. P. Tools for guaranteeing the accessibility of hunt in leased hunting grounds. Protection and rational use of animal and plant resources: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Molodezhniy: Irkutsky GAU, 2023. pp. 159–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8152666
17. Danilkin А. А. About possible depression population of wild ungulates during the economic crisis and the need for proactive measures. Vestnik okhotovedeniya = Bulletin of hunting science. 2015;12(2):171–185. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26367180
18. Shulyatyev А. А. Problems of sustainable use of hunting resources and state supervision in the sphere of hunting. Gumanitarnyyе aspekty okhoty i okhotnichyеgo khozyaystva = Humanitarian aspects of hunting and hunting economy. 2017;(3(6)):146–151. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30480707
19. Kraev N. V. We need a new federal law on hunting and hunting economy. Legislative support for the protection of wildlife: monograph. E. L. Minina, S. A. Bogolyubov, Yu. A. Tikhomirov [et al.]; ed. N. A. Dukhno, S. A. Bogolyubov. Moscow: Yuridicheskiy institut MIIT, 2016. pp. 131–138.
20. Gorokhov D. B., Shunaeva D. D. Hunting areas: ratio of legal regulation and actual situation. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2019;(5):119–132. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/art_2019_5_11
21. Aramileva T. S., Egorov G. V., Komova I. I., Matveychuk S. P., Palaguta S. A., Yudin A. A. Ecological assessment of hunting bag limits: problems and argumentation. Biosfernoyе khozyaystvo: teoriya i praktika. 2022;(6(47)):5–13. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8419611
Review
For citations:
Grebnev I.A. Transformation of the institution of state regulation and ensuring the sustainability of hunting nature management. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2026;27(1):208-218. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2026.27.1.208-218
Views:
183
JATS XML
Email this article 