Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

Yield, ecological plasticity and stability of spring soft and durum wheat varieties in the southern forest steppe of Tyumen region

https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.2.114-123

Abstract

The aim of the research is the assessment of 10 varieties of spring soft wheat approved for use, and 5 promising varieties of spring durum wheat of Russian selection according to yield and adaptability parameters for 2015-2018 on the basis of the results of the test carried out in the southern forest steppe zone of the Tyumen region. Productive and adaptive potential of the varieties was determined by the method of L.A. Zhivotkov co-authored, the average yield in contrast conditions –by the equations of A.A. Rossielle, J. Hemblin, the yield variability – by the method of B.A. Dospekhov, the environmental condition index and ecological plasticity of varieties – by S.A. Eberhart, W.A. Russell, the general adaptive ability of the varieties – by the method of A.V. Kilchevsky, L.V. Hotyleva. The strongest variability of indexes of environmental conditions during the years of testing of the varieties was found in middle-early varieties of spring soft wheat, from -1.08 (2017) to 1.26 (2018). The varieties of spring soft wheat Tyumenskaya Yubileynaya (middle-early, 3.06 t/ha) and Aviada (middle-season, 2.86 t/ha), and of spring durum wheat – Omsky izumrud (3.52 t/ha) were recognized the best in terms of average yield. In the favorable conditions of 2018, on the basis of determination of the percentage of yield of varieties relative to the average among the varieties, the largest productive potential of spring soft wheat varieties was revealed in Tyumenskaya Yubileynaya (middle-early, 111.5 %), Aviada (middle-season, 108.9 %) and spring durum wheat – Omskaya stepnaya (105.7 %). In the unfavorable conditions of 2017, high adaptability was observed in spring soft wheat varieties Ekaterina (middle-early, 118.7%), Ikar (middle-season, 105.0 %) and spring durum wheat – Omskaya stepnaya (105.8 %). Regardless of the specie, all studied varieties had significant yield variability. The most of the varieties were characterized as plastic (bi is equal to or close to 1). Strong responsiveness to change of conditions is determined in spring soft wheat varieties Novosibirskaya 15 (middle-early, bi = 1.11) and Aviada (middle-season, bi = 1.21), and in spring durum wheat Omsky korund (bi = 1.14). The varieties of spring soft wheat Ekaterina (middle-early, Si2 = 1.20), Tyumenskaya 29 (middle-season, Si2 = 0.03) and spring durum wheat Zhemchuzhina Sibiri (Si2 = 0.84) were the best in terms of stability. The varieties of spring soft wheat Tyumenskaya Yubileynaya (midlle-early, GAA = 0.32), Aviada (middle-season, GAA = 0.07) and the spring durum wheat Omsky izumrud (GAA = 0.26) were the best according to the general adaptive ability. The varieties of spring soft wheat Ekaterina (midlle-early) and Aviada (middle-season) and spring durum wheat Omskaya stepnaya were recognized as the best on the basis of the complex assessment of yield and adaptability parameters.

About the Authors

V. A. Sapega
Tyumen Industrial University
Russian Federation

Valery A. Sapega, DSc in Agricultural Science, professor

Volodarsky St., 38, Tyumen, Tyumen region, Russian Federation, 625000



G. Sh. Tursumbekova
State Agrarian University of Northern Zauria
Russian Federation

Galina Sh. Tursumbekova, DSc in Agricultural Science, professor

Respubliki street, 7, Tyumen, Tyumen region, Russian Federation, 625003



References

1. Yushkevich L. V., Shchitov A. G., Egorova N. I., Shtro E. V. Sover-shenstvovanie tekhnologii vozdelyvaniya yachmenya v lesostepi Zapadnoy Sibiri. [Improvement of the technology of barley cultivation in forest-steppe zone of Western Siberia]. Zemledelie. 2013; (2): 26-28. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18849346

2. Dragavtsev V. A., Dragavtseva I. A., Efimova I. L., Morinets A. S., Savin I. Yu. Upravlenie vzaimodeystviem «genotip-sreda» – vazhneyshiy rychag povysheniya urozhaev sel'skokhozyaystvennykh rasteniy. [Control of «genotype-environment» interaction is the most important way for increasing the yields of cultivated plants]. Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2016;(59):105-121. (In Russ.).

3. Novokhatin V. V. Nauchnoe obosnovanie pervichnogo i elitnogo semenovodstva zernovykh kul'tur. [Scientific Substantiation of Primary and Elite Seed-Growing of Cereals]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AICis. 2018;(32(9)):40-47. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36328730

4. Dopierala P., Kordas L. The effects of genotype – environment interaction on the yield and its structure in some winter cereals. Biul. Lnst. Hodowli Aklimat. Rosl. 2009;(253):165-173.

5. Ageeva E. V., Likhenko I. E., Sovetov V. V. Otsenka ekologicheskoy plastichnosti sortoobraztsov myagkoy yarovoy pshenitsy pitomnika Kazakh-stansko-Sibirskoy seti SIMMIT. [Evaluation of Environmental Plasticity of Spring Soft Wheat Samples from the Nursery of the Kazakhstan-Siberian Network of CIMMYT]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AICis. 2018;(32(11)):26-29. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36730419

6. Sapega V. A. Urozhaynost', realizatsiya ee potentsiala i adaptivnost' sortov yarovoy pshenitsy. [Productivity, Realization of Potential of Spring Wheat Varieties and Their Adaptability]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AICis. 2017;(31(10)):49-52. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32301698

7. Zhuchenko A. A. Strategiya adaptivnoy intensifikatsii sel'skogo khozyaystva. [Strategy of adaptive intensi-fication of agriculture]. Pushchino: Otdel NTI PNTs RAN, 1994. 148 p.

8. Goncharenko A. A. Ob adaptivnoy sposobnosti i ekologicheskoy ustoychivosti sortov zernovykh kul'tur. [On adaptivity and ecological resistence of grain crop varieties]. Vestnik Rossel'khozakademii. 2005; (6): 49-53. (In Russ.).

9. Ayalneh T., Letta T., Abinasa M. Assessment of stability, adaptability and yield performance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in South Eastern Ethiopia. Plant Breeding and Seed Science. 2013;67(1):3-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10129-011-0065-3

10. Protic R., Todorovic G., Protic N., Djordjevic R., Vicentijevic D., Delic D., Kopanja M., Prodanovic R. Effect of genotype x environment interaction on grain yield of winter wheat varieties. Bulgarian Journal of Agricul-tural Science. 2013;19(4):697-700. URL: https://agrojournal.org/19/04-11.pdf

11. Hassan M. S., Mohamed G. I. A., El-Said R. A. R. Stability analysis for grain yield and its components of some durum wheat genotypes (Triticum durum L.) under different environments. Asian Journal of Crop science. 2013;5: 179-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2013.179.189

12. Andreeva Z. V., Tsil'ke R. A. Vliyanie ekologicheskikh faktorov na realizatsiyu geneticheskogo potentsiala sortov myagkoy yarovoy pshenitsy v Zapadnoy Sibiri. [The influence of environmental factors on the real genetic potential of soft spring wheat varieties in Western Siberia]. Vestnik KrasGAU = The Bulletin of KrasGAU. 2008;(6):27-32. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12533640

13. Zhivotkov L. A., Morozova Z. A., Sekatueva L. I. Metodika vyyavleniya potentsial'noy produktivnosti i adaptivnosti sortov i selektsionnykh form ozimoy pshenitsy po pokazatelyu «urozhaynost'». [Method to identify of productivity potential and adaptability of the varieties and breeding forms of winter wheat in terms of «yield»]. Selektsiya i semenovodstvo. 1994;(2):3-6. (In Russ.).

14. Rossielle A. A., Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non- stress environments. Crop. Sci. 1981; (21(6)): 27-29.

15. Eberhart S. A., Russell W. A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci. 1966; (6(1)): 36-40.

16. Kil'chevskiy A. V., Khotyleva L. V. Ekologicheskaya selektsiya rasteniy. [Ecological plant breeding]. Minsk: Tekhnalogia, 1997. 372 p.

17. Novokhatin V. V., Shelomentseva T. V. Rost urozhaynosti yarovoy myagkoy pshenitsy v Severnom Zaural'e. [Growth of cropping power of common spring wheat in Northern Transurals]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy sel'skokhozyaystvennoy akademii. 2014;(4):14-17.


Review

For citations:


Sapega V.A., Tursumbekova G.Sh. Yield, ecological plasticity and stability of spring soft and durum wheat varieties in the southern forest steppe of Tyumen region. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2020;21(2):114-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.2.114-123

Views: 968


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)