Directions of state support for technical and technological moderni-zation of dairy farming
https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.2.199-210
Abstract
The article discusses the main directions of state support for technical and technological modernization of the agricultural sector in Russia: soft loans at a rate of no more than 5 %, subsidizing part of the capital costs (CAPEX) for the construction and modernization of livestock complexes and other projects, supporting the renewal of the agricultural machinery park. There have been identified their main disadvantages: limited number of supported projects, insufficient volumes and imbalances in the distribution of limits of support funds between regions and manufacturers, restrictions on the list of pur-chased equipment on preferential terms in the producing country. High efficiency of direct support tools for agricultural producers in the form of subsidizing part of the costs for purchase machinery, equipment and technologies with a high innovative component has been proved.
About the Authors
V. N. Surovtsev
Northwest Research Institute Economy and Organization of Agriculture
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir N. Surovtsev, PhD in Economics, Acting Director
highway Podbelsky d. 7, St. Petersburg, Pushkin, Russian Federation, 196608
E. N. Payurova
Northwest Research Institute Economy and Organization of Agriculture
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena N. Payurova, PhD in Economics, researcher
highway Podbelsky d. 7, St. Petersburg, Pushkin, Russian Federation, 196608
References
1. Uzun V. Ya., Shagayda N. I. Otsenka vliyaniya institutsional'nykh i strukturnykh izmeneniy na razvitie agrarnogo sektora Rossii. [Evaluation of the impact of institutional and structural changes on the development of the Russian agricultural sector]. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019;(4):39-58. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-4-39-58
2. Svetlov N. M., Yanbykh R. G., Loginova D. A. O neodnorodnosti effektov gospodderzhki sel'skogo khozyaystva. [On the diversity of the effects of the state support for agriculture]. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019;(4):59-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-4-59-73
3. Effektivnost' l'gotnogo kreditovaniya sel'khoztovaroproizvoditeley agropromyshlennogo kompleksa (na osnove oprosa). [Efficiency of preferential lending to agricultural producers of the agro-industrial complex (based on a survey)]. Moscow, 2019. 27 p. Available at: https://nifi.ru/images/FILES/Reports/Ligot_kreditovanie_opros.pdf (accessed: 15.01.2020).
4. Oyken V. Osnovy natsional'noy ekonomii. [The foundations of the national economy]. Per. s nem. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1996. 351 p. URL: https://mysocrat.com/book-card/17895-osnovy-nacionalnoj-ehkonomii/
5. Ushachev I. G., Serkov A. F., Maslova V. V., Chekalin V. S. Aktual'nye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya agrarnoy politiki Rossii. [Relevant directions of improvement of agrarian policy of Russia]. APK: Ekonomika, upravlenie. 2019; (3): 4-16. (Un Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33305/193-4
6. Polukhin A. A., Semenova E. I., Novoselov E. A. Napravleniya sover-shenstvovaniya organizatsionno - ekonomicheskogo mekhanizma material'no-tekhnicheskogo obespecheniya otrasley zhivotnovodstva v kontekste importozameshcheniya na resursnykh rynkakh. [The directions of improvement in organizational and economic mechanism of material support of the livestock production branches in the context of import substitution in the resource markets]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaystva Rossii. 2018. (11): 79-83. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32651/2070-0288-2018-11-79-83
7. Dudnik A. V., Neganova V. P., Koryukina N. V. Sovremennye problemy sovershenstvovaniya gosu-darstvennoy podderzhki APK. [Topical direction in the improvement of the state support to agro-industrial com-plex]. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics. 2017;(1):197-202. Режим доступа: https://cyber-leninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-problemy-sovershenstvovaniya-gosudarstvennoy-podderzhki-apk/viewer
8. Nechaev V., Sandu I., Mikhaylushkin P., Zakarchevskiy O. Metodika otsenki investitsiy v tekhniko-tekhnologicheskuyu modernizatsiyu sel'skokho-zyaystvennogo proizvodstva. [Technique of assessment of investments into technical and technological modernization of agricultural production]. APK: Ekonomika, upravlenie. 2019;(3): 47-55. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33305/193-47
9. Alekseev K. I., Novoselov E. A., Porfirov P. A. Kreditovanie priobreteniya sel'skokhozyaystvennoy tekhniki i oborudovaniya dlya zhivot-novodstva kak mera podderzhki tekhnicheskoy i tekhnologicheskoy moderni-zatsii otrasli. [Сrediting the purchase of agricultural machinery and equipment for livestock as a measure to support the technical and technological modernization of the industry]. Ekonomika, trud, upravlenie v sel'skom khozyaystve. 2018;(4): 59-70. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35252019
10. Alekseev K. I., Novoselov E. A. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka tekh-nicheskoy i tekhnologicheskoy modernizatsii kormovoy bazy zhivotnovodstva. [State support for technical and technological modernization of live-stock feed resources]. Ekonomika, trud, upravlenie v sel'skom khozyaystve. 2018; (2): 55-66. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35249479
11. Isaeva O. V. Tekhnicheskaya modernizatsiya agrarnogo sektora Rossii: sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti obespecheniya. [Technical modernization of the agricultural sector in Russia: current state and ways to ensure]. Innovatsii v sel'skom khozyaystve. 2019. (2): 109-115. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38583654&
12. Kostyaev A. I., Nikonov A. G. Razvitie agrarnogo sektora i sel'skikh territoriy Severo-Zapada v usloviyakh politiki importozameshcheniya. [Development of the Agrarian Sector and Rural Areas of Northwest in the Conditions of Import Substitution Policy]. Molochnokhozyaystvennyy vestnik. 2017;(4(28)):182-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2225-4269-2017-00059
Review
For citations:
Surovtsev V.N., Payurova E.N. Directions of state support for technical and technological moderni-zation of dairy farming. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2020;21(2):199-210. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.2.199-210
Views:
537
Email this article 