Preview

Agricultural Science Euro-North-East

Advanced search

Impact of livestock industries on rural development

https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2021.22.4.608-619

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to test the hypothesis of the priority role of livestock breeding in the development of rural areas on the basis of an analysis of livestock industries and determine the degree of territorial heterogeneity of this phenomenon. The study was carried out on the example of 29 regions of the Non-Black Earth Zone of the Russian Federation. Methods of ranking, correlation and variational analysis were used. A noticeable correlation was established between the indicators of the development of the livestock industry and rural development (p = 0.5; 0.6). For poultry farming, this relationship is moderate (p = 0.3; 0.3), pig breeding - weak negative (p = - 0.1; - 0.1). Concrete calculations confirmed the lack of influence of the development of pig breeding on one of the important indicators of the development of rural areas - the growth of acreage. The features of territorial heterogeneity in the development of cattle breeding and rural areas have been consistently investigated on the basis of the same methodology. Three equal groups of regions with a relatively high, medium and relatively low level of their development were identified. It is shown that the group of regions with a relatively high level of development of cattle breeding in the Non-Black Earth Region accounts for about half of the volume of milk and 56% of the production of cattle for slaughter. Neighboring regions in group I form two, in group II - one, in group III - three areas. When comparing the results obtained for cattle breeding and rural areas, it was found that the composition of the regions in the corresponding groups coincides by 67-78 %. When calculating the correlation coefficient between the final ranks of the regions, established when determining the heterogeneity of the development of livestock breeding and the heterogeneity of the development of rural areas, a high tightness of the correlation was revealed (p = 0.7). The hypothesis being tested was confirmed.

About the Authors

Alexander I. Kostyaev
St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPC RAS)
Russian Federation

Alexander I. Kostyaev, DSc in Economics, professor, academician of RAS, chief researcher

7, Highway Podbelskogo,  St. Petersburg, 196608



Galina N. Nikonova
St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPC RAS)
Russian Federation

Galina N. Nikonova, DSc in Economics, professor, corresponding member of RAS, chief researcher

7, Highway Podbelskogo,  St. Petersburg, 196608



References

1. Marsden T., Sonnino R. Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies. 2008;24 (4):422-431. URL: http://www.academia.edu/2302653/Rural_development_and_the_regional_state_Denyingmultifunctional_agriculture_in_the_UK

2. Rol' zhivotnovodstva v ustoychivom razvitii sel'skogo khozyaystva v interesakh prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti i pitaniya. Doklad Gruppy ekspertov vysokogo urovnya po voprosam prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti i pitaniya. Iyul' 2016 goda. [The role of animal husbandry in the sustainable development of agriculture in the interests of food security and nutrition. Report of the High-level Expert Group on Food Security and Nutrition. July 2016]. Rim. 165 p. URL: http://www.fao.org/3/mq860r/mq860r.pdf

3. Ovchintseva L. A. Rol' sel'skogo khozyaystva v razvitii sela. [The role of agriculture in rural development]. Nikonovskie chteniya. 2009;(14):91-93. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16751268

4. Artemova E. I., Dement'eva A. A. Rol' zhivotnovodstva v razvitii sel'skikh territoriy. [The role of livestock in rural development]. Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Natural humanitarian studies. 2020;29 (3):49-52. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2309-4788-2020-10228

5. Bettencourt E., Tilman M., Narciso V., Carvalho M., Henriques P. The Livestock Roles in the Wellbeing of Rural Communities of Timor-Leste. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural. 2015;53 (1):S063-S080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790053s01005

6. Byerlee D., Janvry A., Sadoulet E. Agriculture for Development: Toward a New Paradigm. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 2009:1:15-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144239

7. Amerkhanov Kh. A., Miroshnikov S. A., Kostyuk R. V., Dunin I. M., Legoshin G. P. Proekt «Kontseptsii ustoychivogo razvitiya myasnogo skotovodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2030 goda. [Draft concept for the sustainable development of beef cattle breeding in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030]. Vestnik myasnogo skotovodstva = The Herald of Beef Cattle Breeding. 2017;(1 (97)):7-12. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28862794

8. Petrikov A. V. Politika sel'skogo razvitiya v Rossii: napravleniya i mekhanizmy. [Rural development policy in Russia: directions and mechanisms]. Nikonovskie chteniya. 2019;(24):1-10. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41471135

9. Mikheeva N. N. Analiz differentsiatsii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo polozheniya rossiyskikh regionov. [Analysis of the differentiation of the socio-economic situation of Russian regions]. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 1999;(5):91-102. (In Russ.).

10. Kostyaev A. I. Territorial'naya differentsiatsiya sel'skokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva: voprosy metodologii i teorii. [Territorial differentiation of agricultural production: issues of methodology and theory]. Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbGUEF, 2006. 240 p. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21299450

11. Zubarevich N. V., Safronov S. G. Neravenstvo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov i gorodov Rossii 2000-kh godov: rost ili snizhenie? [The inequality of social and economic development of regions and cities of Russia of the 2000s: growth or decline?]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' = Social sciences and contemporary world. 2013;(6):15-26. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21008618

12. Moroshkina M. V. Differentsiatsiya rossiyskikh regionov po urovnyu ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. [Differentiation of Russian regions by the level of economic development]. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2016;(4):109-114. (In Russ.).

13. Kostyaev A. I., Letunov S. B. Differentsiatsiya sel'skikh territoriy po strukture i dinamike proizvodstva produktsii sel'skogo khozyaystva. [Differentiation of rural areas according to the structure and dynamics of agricultural production]. Nauchnoe obozrenie: teoriya i praktika. 2018;(9):166-183. (In Russ.).

14. Serkov A. F., Amosov A. I., Nikonova G. N. Ekonomicheskie instituty agrarnogo rynka (sostoyanie i otsenka). [Economic institutions of the agricultural market (state and assessment)]. Moscow: VNIIESKh, 2003. 73 p.

15. Kosheleva N. N. Korrelyatsionnyy analiz i ego primenenie dlya podscheta rangovoy korrelyatsii Spirmena. [Correlation analysis and its application for calculating Spearman's rank correlation]. Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2012;(5):23-26. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17825841

16. Bufetova A. N. Mezhregional'nye razlichiya v urovne zhizni v Rossii. [Interregional differences in level of living in Russia]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki. 2014;14 (3):113-123. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22648921


Review

For citations:


Kostyaev A.I., Nikonova G.N. Impact of livestock industries on rural development. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2021;22(4):608-619. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2021.22.4.608-619

Views: 373


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-9081 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1396 (Online)